Answer:
No, it is not.
Step-by-step explanation:
comparing the two given values, 1.75 and 6, estimating 1.75 for 6 is not reasonable. This is due to the fact that converting 1.75 to the nearest whole number gives 2 which is far away from 6. Since,
6 - 2 = 4
So, estimating 1.75 for 6 would involve a large value of error. Which make it unreasonable. It would have been more reasonable to estimate 1.75 for 2.
Consecutive odd numbers are 2 apart
they are
x,x+2,x+4,x+6
10+2x=x+4+x+6
10+2x=2x+10
x=x
true
any consecutive odd integers will work
1,3,5,7 works
3,5,7,9 works
etc
Answer:
noisy I think because of how they're describing them
Here we go.
1) x/5 - 4h = 35
2) {(6-p)/3}+8
3) This is just 1.4k, since the distance you're trying to find is 1.4 times k feet.
You can include a diagram easily enough. Just draw a baseball diamond and two lines, one connecting first and third base and labeled 1.4k, while the other line, connecting home to third, is labeled k.
Hope that helped!
Answer:
I am not the best in this type of math, the best thing I can do is help you.
You see that there is a pattern in the chart? X adds 2 every column, and Y adds 4 every column.
I believe the slope simplified is 2/1, if you are following y/x. If not, then the other way around.
Unfortunately, I can't help you with the rest of the problem, but I hope you can get a good idea of what your supposed to do.
Have a good day.