Answer:
C. Computer
Explanation:
In some kind of a way, human and computer memory have resemblances. A human's short-term memory looks like computer's RAM. Human's short-term memory is limited and volatile, the same is for computer's RAM. A computer doesn't have enough memory very often, and when it's turned off, all of the data disappears. That's why our long-term memory is similar to computer's hard drive -- both our memory and computer's hard drive take long time to respond, but can store a big amount of data. The difference between hard drive and human's memory --<em> the longer the information stays in the computer, it doesn't change a bit, but when it comes to humans, the longer they are in our memory, they will continue to change and reconstruct the events as a response to changes in our moods or states of mind.</em>
Here is the answer. If the average adult produces $20,000 of output per year, the amount of global output that is <span> lost annually as a result of adult deaths from secondhand smoke is 48 billion dollars. Consider this:
</span>600,000 total deaths
<span>165,000 children </span>
<span>435,000 adults </span>
<span>435,00 times $110,00 output per year = $47,859,000,000 or $48 billion.</span>
Answer:
Ghandi’s non-violent personality is a rhetorical device all in itself. It makes him look far more approachable to the receiver of the letter. One example starts on line 64, Ghandi states, “If you think that there is any substance in my letter, and if you will care to discuss matters with me, and if to that end you would like me to postpone publication of this letter, I shall gladly refrain on receipt of a telegram to that effect soon after this reaches you.” Ghandhi doesn’t threaten the British government instead he offers to not publish the letter so that they can sit down and have a civil talk about it. On top of that, he had the letter hand-delivered by an English friend. He is unquestionbly far more civil than the Americans were about their Declaration of Independence.
Explanation:
I am unsure about what you ment by the one and two part but I fixed a few words and tried to make it run smoother. I hope it helps!
D, his experiment was based on the genetic traits of the pea plants, so pollination from other plants would mess up his experiment, hope this helps!!
