Financial status impacts marital stability in many different ways. If a married couple struggles with financial worries there would be be blaming, worrying and shame in the family that can lead to many arguments. The husband or the wife may feel they are not doing enough to provide and to protect their families and may feel anxious as a result. If the main concern of a family is its financial survival, many other necessities may get neglected because of lack of money. The couple may feel tense and the tension may even contribute to the break up of the marriage.
Other factors associated with a couple's financial status are: health, education, recreational activities. The better the couple's financial status, the more healthier the family is, the better the education they can afford for their children and the better the cultural and social activities they can participate in.
The answer to this question is socialization :)
Answer:
B) More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services.
Explanation:
If the government removes any of its current restrictions, the overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions so more consumer will take legal services of the lawyer because the services provided by the lawyer are less costly and affordable for the people of the society. The legal services are very important for the consumer if it is not costly every person will use it.
Absolutely not. Human development is another branch of biology, and in order to understand it, people need to learn biology. Since David hates biology, this is not an option for him as he would have to go through similar things.
Answer:
Social exchange theory
Explanation:
Social exchange theory is the theory that says that social behavior is the result of an exchange process.
According to this theory, people weigh the potential benefits and risks of their actions. When the risks outweigh the rewards, people will not engage in the action or conduct.
In this case, <u>Person A donated money because the potential benefits included the boost of her self-esteem</u>, since this weight too much to this person, she donated the money.
On the other side, <u>the risks for Person B outweighed the rewards, since he was fearful or running out of money </u>and therefore he did not donate it.
