1.- These 3 arrangements differ from each other, since the Amalgamation, is the mixture of different things, they may be cultures or races, the Assimilation is the process of adaptation of the immigrant to the receiving society. This acquires the culture and customs of the adoption community, disappearing their status as "different". To the extent that the immigrant adopts the culture of receiving society, this will admit you as one more member, producing its full integration. This theory has been strongly criticized, from the ethical point of view, but also by believing that the immigrant will adapt to the new culture, independently of its origin, race or religion. And Pluralism refers to the dominant trend is that neither natives nor immigrants want to lose their identity, and adaptation would occur through the adherence of all, to common principles of coexistence , being able to maintain at certain levels the cultural characteristics of each group and as long as the conflicts that may arise do not affect these basic principles of coexistence, which are those that confer a sense of community and avoid social fragmentation. The most common stereotypes are: Americans, Latins, African Americans, Chinese, they will be more or less frequent depending on the city where you live, Latins are a common stereotype in the northern United States, and I do not think they are harmful to any group, The harmfulness of something or someone does not come from their race, or stereotyping.2.- In my country we experience the 3 arrangements, amalgamation, assimilation and pluralism, nowadays, thanks to globalization, we experience all 3 in many countries of the world, in almost all countries there is a mixture of races and customs derived from foreign citizens, in many of them foreigners adapt so much to the culture that they are inserted very quickly assimilating it as their own, and in many others the different cultures struggle to maintain their origin and customs, giving way to pluralization.
Answer:thanks 4 the points
Explanation: lol
Answer:
Explanation:
The people who called it the golden door, usually hadn't experienced the harsh reality of the island. They were usually people who wanted to go to America, but could not afford it, or didn't have the right circumstances. The people that called it the isle of tears had either been there or heard the stories of what it was really like. Ellis Island was full of sadness, hunger, and fear. I think the isle of tears is a better description because the immigrants on the island did cry, in fact, they cried often. The golden door to America is not a realistic version of the island. The island was a door to America, but not a golden one. Therefore the isle of tears is a more fitting name.
If you could send me a link or a picture of the lesson, I could help with the quotes
