Only one hundred and seven (107) million American were employed in non agricultural jobs, at the lowest employment point.
Employment began to rise steadily after reaching its lowest point in the year 2010.
In 2010 is when labour market in United States remained weak where market deterioration had taken place for the past two years.
It is during the first quarter when the rate and level of unemployed fell.
Only 14.8 million people were unemployed during the fourth quarter of 2010 and that made the rate of unemployed to go down by 9.6 percent.
The unemployed and the employed of labor force was being held in 2010.
The skepticism about the empire of Ghana and the accounts for it is nothing weird because the majority of what is written about it is from two people from the same place, that had totally different views and interpretations on the things, and came from different culture.
Very often in the historical text, the people that wrote something have been very subjective, not objective. Thus the writings of these two Arab geographers can be very misleading, as they described what they saw with their own eyes, but also with using their own perception. That has proven numerous times to give very inaccurate depictions of a society and culture, like the depictions of the Romans for the Celts, or of the Greeks for the Scythian female warriors that they named Amazons.
There's only one point of view unfortunately, and it is always much more reliable when multiple writings are available from people from multiple different backgrounds, or the best scenario if it is writings from the people in question.
#1 farmers piled up debt, over produced food causing prices to fall.
industry produced more than was bought, many items bought on credit
disparity in wealth; few getting wealthy and not spending enough to match the production output
<span>prices declined, people panis and sold stock and took money out of the banks
</span>#2 in beginning, had a hands-off policy
then adopted a volunteerism policy but business and labor did not work together
local and state governments did not have resources to help people on a local level
created RFC to get loans to businesses but funds did not trickle doen to citizens
unemployment and homelessness high
<span>Hoover did not reaction quickly enough and relied too much on local, state, and private efforts to fix the economic problems
</span>
Merry Christmas!
Answer:
The South valued slaves more because they used them as workers in farming and agriculture.The South had a lot of fertile land which they used to their advantage in the cotton and tobacco industry. The north was more abolitionist and supportive of getting rid of slavery while the stubborn South wanted to keep their ways of life in place. They (the North) focused on becoming more modern and industrialized and more city-like. The North expanded their economy and built more factories and job opportunities, while the South focused on farming.
Explanation:
That would be my answer.
Answer:
Muslim forces repeatedly attacked the Christian Byzantine Empire.
In 1453, Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Empire. The city was renamed Istanbul
Explanation:
The crusades were arguably started because of the constant attacks of the Muslim forces on the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine Empire is the medieval version of the Eastern Roman Empire, and as explained in the question, it was a christian state.
In 1453, after a long siege, the Seljuk Turks conquered Constantinople, which had been the Eastern Roman Empire for over 1,000 years. After the conquest, the Turks changed the name of the city to Istanbul.
