Divided government: occurs when the governors are unable to reach an agreement about the governance of the country. On that occasion, several different aspects of how the government should act arise, lacking an efficient consensus among politicians and generating strong cases of politicization, which prevents efficient and necessary public policies from being established and voted to allow their execution.
Weak party discipline: Prevents rapid voting on the implementation of public policies. As a result, the implementation of these policies is delayed and precarious. In addition, it makes the work of the federal government more difficult, forcing each parliamentarian to negotiate for these policies separately, making it difficult for political agreements to exist, as the governor starts to act individually.
Growth in the number of interest groups: When a public policy is established and needs to go into the execution process, it is necessary that all government officials work together, which does not happen when interest groups are generated. Each interest group acts individually, seeking personal and not collective benefits.
Political action committees: They can promote the interests of just a group of government officials, generate politicization and polarization of political thought, in addition to generating power gaps that can prevent the implementation of public policies.
Indian nationalism developed as a concept during the Indian independence movement which campaigned for independence from British rule. ... It continues to strongly influence the politics of India and reflects an opposition to the sectarian strands of Hindu nationalism and Muslim nationalism.
Answer:
Moderate daily exercise is an excellent way of reducing stress, maintaining a healthy weight, strengthening aging bones and improving attitude. Different techniques work for different people, but many have found practices such as meditation, yoga, tai chi, walking, prayer and deep breathing exercises to be helpful
Explanation:
I hope that help u
Answer:
Conflict
Explanation:
In general terms, we can see that sociological perspectives focus on two opposing themes: While the structural or functionalist approach views society as composed of varios parts, having each a function that when fullfilled , it makes a contribution to the society's equilibrium.
The kurds have a long history as ethnic group , being in middle east. Bein identified themsevles apart from Arabic majorities and having a more progressive , secular, and western orientation, they fail still to be recognized as a state nation.
This is why Conflict theorists would argue in the case of Kurds:
Why the society has failed or why kurds have not been assimilated and giving a function and meaning?
Then they would see society as divided into groups each with different power and resources that are in a dynamic of constant struggle and exploit with one another (Turkey vs Kurds)
