Read the excerpt from “Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry.”

1 answer:

3 0

Factual evidence is used to appeal to the reader’s sense of logic describes the rhetorical appeal used in illustrating the destructive nature of censorship.

Answer: Option A

Explanation:

Rudolf Anaya in his poem ‘Take the tortilla out of the poetry’ establishes strong evidence against the censorship of multi-cultural writers and their works. Anaya emphasizes that in the early 1960’s, the books written in another language depicting a different culture, other than English, were banned.

He explains that this was because the books might not be understandable and have no significance to the ‘universal readers’. He supports his argument by providing the evidence of burning his Spanish book in the school by the censor board.

You might be interested in

What is a business deal????????

vova2212 [387]

It’s when a business makes a deal or trade, which is a fair and mutual agreement between both businesses.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

President Roosevelt gave his Four Freedoms speech in 1941 as his State of the Union address, asking Congress and the American pe

zhenek [66]

Answer: I would like to go with A and "During sixteen long months this assault has blotted out the whole pattern of democratic life" this statement also supports A.

5 0

3 years ago

As principal of Westbank Senior High School, I certify that these seniors have met all of the requirements set forth by the Ocea

andreev551 [17]

Answer:

The answer would be "D. I hereby declare."

Explanation:

It has a strong sense of vocabulary.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In harlem What does the author think really happens to a dream defferes?

Sav [38]

Answer:

The speaker wonders what happens to a deferred dream. He wonders if it dries up like a raisin in the sun, or if it oozes like a wound and then runs. It might smell like rotten meat or develop a sugary crust.

Explanation:

I'm not sire what sentence it is though.

8 0

2 years ago

HUU Class comment "Well, I have my moments of courage," I said as I gently wrapped a strand of her brown curlyhair around my fin

Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

The main conflict is the choice of whether Yasi should come clean to her Grandma about her sexuality and Hannah or not.

Considering the sensitivity of the situation, it would seem like the thing to do is be secretive about it. But to be able to openly enjoy her life with Hannah, Yasi needs to at least keep her family informed about her situation. This will help keep her loved ones together, even if she doesn't tell it to everyone in the community or society. As long as her immediate family members know about it, that should be all that matters.

Explanation:

The case of one's sexuality is a sensitive and even taboo subject in many parts of the modern world. Yasi's reluctance to come clean to her Grandmother about her bisexuality is one major conflict in the story so far. Even though she had told her parents about it, not everyone in her family knows it yet. And she wanted to keep it that way too, to save everyone the hurt and pain it might bring.

But at the same time, if she can tell her grandmother about it, then she can be assured that at least those important to her know about her life. She need not tell it everyone in the community or society, as long as her family knows the truth. She owes no one anything, nor does her happiness depend on their opinions. But at the same time, she should do the right thing by telling at least her family members.

7 0

2 years ago