The rivers provided water for people and their livestock.
Basically, various rivers in the world provides resources such as water, food and transportation for trade.
- Example of ancient rivers are the River Nile in Ancient Egyptians, River Tigris in Mesopotamia, Yellow River in Ancient Chinese, Indus river in Ancient India etc
- These rivers were good locations for the ancient civilizations because its provided supply for drinking water and made the land fertile for farming.
- Also, these rivers makes goods and people could be transported easily.
- Its also enables fishing and hunting of animals that came to drink water.
In conclusion, the most notable influence of rivers during ancient civilization is that its provides water for people and their livestock.
Learn about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/6665331</em>
The correct answer is B. The potential for the results to improve the world is not evident.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is a philosophical perspective ad theory that focuses on increasing the well-being and happiness of individuals while decreasing suffering or pain. Also, for utilitarians, the practical uses and results prevail over other factors. Due to this, utilitarians might argue science is not valuable because a big part of it is understanding how natural phenomenons work, and this might be considered to lack practical uses or to help the world improve. Thus, the reason for a utilitarian to argue against the value of science is that "the potential for the results to improve the world is not evident".
Answer:
The Agricultural Revolution gave Britain at the time the most productive agriculture in Europe, with 19th-century yields as much as 80% higher than the Continental average. Even as late as 1900, British yields were rivaled only by Denmark, the Netherlands, and Belgium.
The Industrial Revolution was a changing point for many aspects of human life and the overall standard of living. Agriculture changed as well during this time as technology, such as the seed drill, the Dutch plough, was able to increase human productivity and led there to be higher outputs of food (Johnson).
Explanation:
Even without knowing your answer choices I would say that the U.S economy had fewer jobs and lower wages. So that gave Americans fewer resources .
