1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kitty [74]
3 years ago
11

Why did american colonists object to the taxes on british goods?

History
1 answer:
Dominik [7]3 years ago
4 0

They objected to the taxes on British goods because the Pilgrims had no say inn how the British Crown was going to rule the taxes. Its in contrast to the principle named 'Taxation without Representation'.

You might be interested in
Which sentence best describes the main effect of the English bill of rights
Kitty [74]

Answer:

where are the answer choices

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were two important food crops that the Europeans took from the Americas?
ExtremeBDS [4]
The answer is potatoes and maize
4 0
3 years ago
How the settlement of europeans in the americans affected the native population
lesya [120]
Because Europeans settled in the Americas lots of the Native Americans died. Most of them died because when the Europeans came over they brought new diseases with them which killed most of the Native Americans so the settlement of the Europeans effected the Native population badly
4 0
3 years ago
What is the name of the legislative branch at the federal level
olga_2 [115]

Answer:

The legislative branch is made up of the House and Senate, known collectively as the Congress.

4 0
3 years ago
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on
Nostrana [21]

Answer:  the representation of states in Congress.

<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on  </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>

Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How has the Athenian Constitution changed over time?
    5·1 answer
  • The moon takes 29 1/2 days to pass through its phases. Explain why a lunar calendar would be inaccurate.
    12·1 answer
  • What was Reconstruction? Was it effective in ending discrimination in the South?​
    13·1 answer
  • What did sumerians believe about cities?
    15·1 answer
  • Who is Benito Mussolini
    14·1 answer
  • What is necessary for a state to be formed within an existing state
    5·1 answer
  • 7. Which of the following do political parties NOT do?
    8·1 answer
  • What are three causes and effects of the columbian exchange?
    15·1 answer
  • If anyone could label this for me that'd be great​
    14·1 answer
  • 2. What main problem does Maria face?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!