Answer:
A. State laws can ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places
Explanation:
It is Option A. because when State laws ensure fair access for voters to registration and polling places, every eligible voters or electorates will be given adequate chance and opportunity to vote whoever they believe will represent their interest without biases to another candidate or party. Hence, the right answer is Option A.
It is not option B, because when State laws prohibit political speech if it is considered controversial, that equates to suppression of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, which will eventually results to campaigns being restricted. Thus, this action by the State will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option C. because when State laws restrict voting if the government has a good reason, then some electorates will be disenfranchised, and the election result, will not show the true reflection of the people's will. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
It is not Option D. because when State laws benefit some people and hurt others to keep an election fair, those the laws hurt, will be disenfranchised, and that will show biases from the government towards a particular candidate or party over others. Thus, this action by the state will not support a fair election process.
Answer:
The answer is actually B. and I hope that this helped you have a great day!
Well judging from the battle of the Alamo they didn't want it to happen.
Answer:
First, the President must nominate someone to become a Justice on the United States Supreme Court when there is a vacancy. Then, the Senate must confirm the nomination with a majority vote.
Explanation:
There are no qualifications listed by the Constitution for becoming a Justice. The only steps one has to go through is the nomination and Senate confirmation.
However, in practice, having experience in law is a requirement as all previous Justices have been trained in law, even if they didn't go to law school.
