All categories

3 years ago

Write 6.2 as a fraction and in word form.

Mathematics

2 answers:

deff fn [24]3 years ago

7 0

Hello.

1.) six point two tenths and 31/5

2.) 2.05 and 41/20

Have a nice day

nevsk [136]3 years ago

3 0

6.2:

fraction: .2 = 0.20 = 20/100

fraction: 6 20/100

Word form: six point two

two and five hundredths

fraction: 2 5/100

decimal form 2.05

hope this helps

You might be interested in

You measure a piece of rope and find its length to be 12m . Find the percent error of this measurement

MrRissso [65]

percentage error is .5/12 = 4.17%

Hope this helps!

~LENA~

6 0

3 years ago

Slav-nsk [51]

Triangles ABC and DEF may or may not be congruent, because the angle-angle-angle (AAA) postulate is not a criterion for congruency of any two triangles. This is because the angle-angle-angle postulate only incorporates the angles of the triangles, and the side lengths are not specified, so congruency may or may not be true for these triangles.

3 0

2 years ago

Shelly bought 7 boxes of fish food and 2 packets of cat food. Each box of fish food contained 6 pouches, and each packet of cat

AfilCa [17]

Answer: 34 more pouches

7 boxes - fish food; 1 box contained 6 pouches

Total amount of fish food is 7 × 6 = 42 pouches of fish food

2 packets - cat food; 1 packet contained 4 pouches

Total amount of cat food is 2 × 4 = 8 pouches

How many more pouches of fish food than cat food did Shelly buy?

42 pouches - 8 pouches = 34 pouches

Therefore there was 34 more pouches of fish food than cat food

7 0

3 years ago

Which composition of transformations would map LMNO to L''M'N''O''?

mrs_skeptik [129]

What are the coordinates or plz put the graph in the question

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Tonya and Pearl each completed a separate proof to show that alternate interior angles AKL and FLK are congruent. Who completed

zalisa [80]

Answer:

Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong

Step-by-step explanation:

AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.

But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.

The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation

8 0

1 year ago