Answer:
Break-even point= 7,900 new costumers
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Assume that during a recent fiscal year, one outlet spent $1,659,000 on a promotional campaign for its website that offered two free months of service for new subscribers.
In addition, assume the following information: Number of months an average new customer stays with the service (including the two free months) 22 months Revenue per month per customer subscription $16 Variable cost per month per customer subscription $5.
Break-even point= fixed costs/ contribution margin
Fixed costs= 1,659,000
Contribution margin= (16*20)-(5*22)= 210
Break-even point= 1,659,000/210= 7,900 new costumers
Answer: im pretty sure shes the phineas and ferb character
Explanation:
Answer: $1,014,300
Explanation:
The company wants to maintain 20% of the next month's needs as ending inventory.
One Miniwap requires 2.5 kg of Jurision to be made.
Materials purchased is;
= Ending inventory + Materials used - Begining inventory
Ending Inventory;
= 20% of September Jurision
= 20% * 21,300 * 2.5
= 10,650 kg
Materials used
= 2.5 kg * August Miniwaps
= 2.5 * 22,600
= 56,500 kg
Materials Purchased = 10,650 + 56,500 - 10,800
= 56,350 kg
Cost of Jurision is $18 per kilo
= 56,350 * 18
= $1,014,300
Answer:
The Capability Index for this process is 1.04. The right answer is B
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
μ = 31 Seconds
USL = 45
LSL = 10
Standard deviation σ= 4.5
Therefore, in order to calculate the Capability Index for this process we would have to use the following formula:
Cpk=Min<u>(
USL-μ</u> , <u>μ-
LSL</u>)
3×σ 3×σ
Cpk=Min<u>(
45-31</u> , 31<u>-
10</u>)
3×4.5 3×4.5
Cpk = Min ( 1.04,1.56) = 1.04
The Capability Index for this process is 1.04
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
