The father in an ancient Roman family was legally allowed to sell his children into slavery.
<h3>What is the significance of the ancient Roman family?</h3>
The system in an ancient Roman family was such that the father was considered as the family head and was also responsible for taking important decisions for the family.
As they had such powers, the father of an ancient Roman family had the rights to sell and trade his children as a slave, if they tried to disobey his decisions.
Hence, option A holds true regarding ancient Roman family.
Learn more about ancient Roman family here:
brainly.com/question/17123304
#SPJ1
I don’t fully understand this question but I think the different government tactics
<span>In the prince of folly,Desiderius Erasmus examined his contemporary world of the Medieval ages and put forth in satire,using a narrator and main character personified as folly,its deep rooted ignorance and stubborness for all to see,to reveal what the world lacked.Thomas Mores utopia ,with similar intentions,practically illustrates a more direct solution to the times with his depictions of the manners and ways of distant people of a place known as utopia.</span>
The federalists wanted a constitution that would be able to defend citizens from abuses of power. But they saw no incompatibility between individual rights and the formation of a minimally structured central power to confront the complex problems. In opposition were the anti-federalists
, they insisted that states should be free and independent and saw the creation of the United States as a new form of tyranny.
This is important to show how the US can be free and democratic about the opinions.
Answer:
1. Federal troops allowed the Confederates to dig in before attacking the city.
3. Lee was not there to defend it, thinking the Union was headed to Richmond.
5. The Union commanders overestimated the Confederate strength.
Explanation:
