Answer:
ANSWER BELOW------Please Mark me brainliest!!!
Explanation:
It would be C
A, "Teachers, not students, should be in charge of assigned seating in the cafeteria." would be a hypocritical statement to the author's claim. So, its not
B also isn't correct because the author's claim never mentions about the flaws of the club. So that statement is pointless.
And D. That defeats the purpose. The author claim is the opposite and the statement would be no good.
Hope this helps!
I was not bullying anyone i was just asking a question
U.S. immigration law is very complex, and there is much confusion as to how it works. The Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA), the body of law governing current immigration policy, provides for an annual worldwide limit of 675,000 permanent immigrants, with certain exceptions for close family members.
I realllly don’t knowww search it up
<span>His realist way of presenting life Rather elongated subject
</span><span>appeals to me Predicate (what the subject does to the pred)
I think that it PARSES to something like that. (But I'm not that parsimonius !!!)</span>