1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
topjm [15]
3 years ago
11

PLZ!!!!! HELP

History
2 answers:
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
8 0
Hey there!

They were able to expand their empire through sheer force. At some points, they were burned down by Gauls and had their armies defeated, but they continued to expand their empire by not giving up.

In the pre-republic era, a great example occurred. The Romans signed a treaty with their Latin neighbors saying that they would be ae\s as long as Earth and Heaven endured. Soon after, they betrayed their treaty through their conquest of the Italian Peninsula. They were hesitant to ally with anybody at some points, and glad to do so at others. It really depends.

Hope this helps!
GaryK [48]3 years ago
3 0
Oh well then It'd be conquest or in other words, force

You might be interested in
Can anybody answer this question please? Hurry
Wewaii [24]
I think it’s to see light
4 0
3 years ago
Pretend that you are US citizen in the 1930s. As you hear about Germany and Italy invading other countries to expand the influen
kumpel [21]

If I was an ordinary person in my 1930s and aged 40 with a middle income job such as an 'office assistant', I would not be in favour of helping other countries.

I would personally prefer a policy of isolation from the rest of the world. Primarily, this would be because I had seen with my very won eyes, the death and destruction bought on by World War I and more importantly the Great Depression.


With millions of job less people, poverty and people barely making ends meet, I would want our government to concentrate on the welfare of our own people, rather than go to war with countries thousands of miles away.

3 0
3 years ago
Which two phrases best explain major direct results of the fall of the roman empire?
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

Invasions by Barbarian tribes. The most straightforward theory for Western Rome's collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire's borders.

Explanation:

I got you.

7 0
2 years ago
Match the following Enlightenment thinker with their philosophy.
Inessa [10]

The philosophers of these enlightenment thinkers would be grouped as follows

  • John Locke believed that  humans have natural rights to life, liberty, and property; and, people form governments to protects these natural rights. If, however, government violates peoples natural rights, people have the right to overthrow that government.
  • Baron de Montesquieu believed in the separation of government (balance of power); and the government elected by the people is the best form of government.
  • Rousseau believed in  in life, liberty, fraternity and a social contract would that give men real freedom in exchange for their obedience to a self-imposed law; the common good supersedes the individual, or private ambitions; all citizens should participate in government
  • Hobbes believed humans are basically selfish creatures and need governments to protect them from their own selfishness and evil; thought the rule of a king was best, but believed believed a diverse group of representatives of the people would prevent a king from being cruel and unfair.
  • Voltaire believed in religious tolerance

<h3>Who is an enlightenment thinker?</h3>

This is the term that is used to refer to the people that were central to the period enlightenment. They were the ones that had to do with the use and the celebration of human reason in such a way that the issues faced in the society can be resolved.

Read more on enlightenment thinkers here

brainly.com/question/2496343

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Which of the following is not part of the liberal ideals of 1848: Select one: a. people should have individual rights, including
yaroslaw [1]
B.)the most talented and wealthyshould earn for the masses
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 4 point<br> What is the volume of the prism shown?
    9·2 answers
  • How did southern states react to the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860
    13·1 answer
  • 1)Which of the following describes one effect the United States' entrance into World War II had on minority groups?
    10·2 answers
  • Write a 50-to 75-word paragraph explaining the ways in which the Greeks and Romans have
    5·1 answer
  • Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?
    9·2 answers
  • What lies between the Blackland Prairie and the Edwards Plateau.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these was President Lincolns central goals during the Civil War? End Slavery in all U.S states Preserve the Union Keep
    10·2 answers
  • The different environments of colonial North America contributed to a wide variety of ​
    5·1 answer
  • Look at the map. Then read each sentence and choose the best answers from the drop-down menus.
    7·2 answers
  • 7. A Spartan warrior was told to return from war
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!