As with many cultures, a person’s quality of life depended in many ways on their rank within the social structure.
Two Romans living at the same time in the same city could have very different lives.
Rich…
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses –
often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They
enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded
by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold
exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the
day.
…and poor
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out
in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse
or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn
babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a
servant or slave.
Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who
relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things
in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a
man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He
alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and
who they would marry.
There were other traditions that all Romans shared. Whatever their
individual circumstances, all Romans observed certain practices at
dinner time, the main meal of the day. Although they might eat very
different food, they ate it in roughly the same way.
And Romans of all classes made a point of visiting the baths
after work each day. There they would mix freely with their fellow
citizens, exercising, washing and chatting. To citizens, the baths made
them feel superior to the rest of the world – they made them feel Roman.
Answer: Psychosocial change
Explanation:
Psychosocial Theory of Development by Erik Erikson.
There are 8 stages of development in human life span and each stage is characterized by conflict and task.
Stage 1: (birth to 1 year)
A stage where infant depend on those who care for them. It is called the stage of trust and mistrust.
Stage 2: (1-3 years). A stage of learning where toddlers learn about their environment and many things.
Stage 3 (3-6 years) The preschool stage, learning to plan, achieve goals and interact.
Stage 4 (6-12 years) Elementary school stage.
Stage 5 (12-19 years) The stage of adolescence.
Stage 6 (20s- 40s) The early adulthood, the stage of intimacy against isolation.
Stage 7 (40years- 60s) middle adulthood till mid 60s
Stage 8 (mid 60s- death) It is called adulthood, this stage could be a stage of happiness or bitterness, joy or depression, despair, all depends on how their life had been spent.
Answer:
belief perseverance
Explanation:
Belief perseverance: In psychology, the term belief perseverance is defined as the propensity of an individual to hold on his or her former beliefs even after encountering new information that generally disconfirms the earlier beliefs.
An individual who is experiencing belief perseverance tends to think that whatever he or she is thinking or holding the belief is true in regards to something, therefore whenever a person finds a valid contradiction about his or her belief then the person chooses to dismiss, discredit, or misinterpret.
In the question above, Judy's reaction BEST illustrates the belief perseverance.
the voyage of the Great Treasure Fleet :)
When a justice agrees with the majority decision but disagrees with the rationale presented in the majority opinion, he or she may write a concurring opinion.
The concurring opinion is a written opinion that filed by a judge which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court.