Question

It is obviously impracticable in the Federal Government of these States to secure all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide for the interest and safety of all. Individuals entering into society must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained. It is at all times difficult to draw with precision the line between those rights which must be surrendered, and those which may be preserved; and, on the present occasion, this difficulty was increased by a difference among the several States as to their situation, extent, habits, and particular interests. In all our deliberations on this subject, we kept steadily in our view that which appears to us the greatest interest of every true American, the consolidation of our Union, in which is involved our prosperity, felicity, safety--perhaps our national existence. This important consideration, seriously and deeply impressed on our minds, led each State in the Convention to be less rigid on points of inferior magnitude than might have been otherwise expected; and thus, the Constitution which we now present is the result of a spirit of amity, and of that mutual deference and concession, which the peculiarity of our political situation rendered indispensable. —September 17, 1787 How did the members of the constitutional convention view the relationship between the states and the federal government? States must give some authority to the federal government for the good of the nation as a whole. The federal government should provide states with a greater level of sovereignty to avoid conflict. The states and the federal government must together yield to the wishes of all citizens to form a proper democracy.

Answer 1

Answer:Members of the Constitutional Convention thought that states must give some authority to the federal government for the good of the nation as a whole.

Explanation: The Constitutional Convention of 1787 met in Philadelphia with a clear objective: to reform the Articles of Confederation, which had been the main rule of the United States of America from independence until then.

Answer 2

Answer:

Members of the Constitutional Convention thought that states must give some authority to the federal government for the good of the nation as a whole.

Explanation:

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 met in Philadelphia with a clear objective: to reform the Articles of Confederation, which had been the main rule of the United States of America from independence until then.

The reason was the evident incompetence of this norm to regulate the politics and economy of the nation, characterized by the government of a Congress of the Confederation in which each state was represented equally, and where a unanimous consensus was required to establish measures. In addition, the states retained for themselves rights of great importance, especially in commercial and monetary matters.

This led to a virtual state of anomie, where the government could not impose its administration because it did not have the necessary legitimacy to do so. Therefore, the Convention raised the need for the states to give up rights to create a strong and powerful Federal Government, capable of leading the nation and regulating the country's economy.