1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
larisa86 [58]
3 years ago
10

It is obviously impracticable in the Federal Government of these States to secure all rights of independent sovereignty to each,

and yet provide for the interest and safety of all. Individuals entering into society must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstance, as on the object to be obtained. It is at all times difficult to draw with precision the line between those rights which must be surrendered, and those which may be preserved; and, on the present occasion, this difficulty was increased by a difference among the several States as to their situation, extent, habits, and particular interests. In all our deliberations on this subject, we kept steadily in our view that which appears to us the greatest interest of every true American, the consolidation of our Union, in which is involved our prosperity, felicity, safety--perhaps our national existence. This important consideration, seriously and deeply impressed on our minds, led each State in the Convention to be less rigid on points of inferior magnitude than might have been otherwise expected; and thus, the Constitution which we now present is the result of a spirit of amity, and of that mutual deference and concession, which the peculiarity of our political situation rendered indispensable. —September 17, 1787 How did the members of the constitutional convention view the relationship between the states and the federal government? States must give some authority to the federal government for the good of the nation as a whole. The federal government should provide states with a greater level of sovereignty to avoid conflict. The states and the federal government must together yield to the wishes of all citizens to form a proper democracy.
History
2 answers:
Nikolay [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:Members of the Constitutional Convention thought that states must give some authority to the federal government for the good of the nation as a whole.

Explanation: The Constitutional Convention of 1787 met in Philadelphia with a clear objective: to reform the Articles of Confederation, which had been the main rule of the United States of America from independence until then.

Amiraneli [1.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Members of the Constitutional Convention thought that states must give some authority to the federal government for the good of the nation as a whole.

Explanation:

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 met in Philadelphia with a clear objective: to reform the Articles of Confederation, which had been the main rule of the United States of America from independence until then.

The reason was the evident incompetence of this norm to regulate the politics and economy of the nation, characterized by the government of a Congress of the Confederation in which each state was represented equally, and where a unanimous consensus was required to establish measures. In addition, the states retained for themselves rights of great importance, especially in commercial and monetary matters.

This led to a virtual state of anomie, where the government could not impose its administration because it did not have the necessary legitimacy to do so. Therefore, the Convention raised the need for the states to give up rights to create a strong and powerful Federal Government, capable of leading the nation and regulating the country's economy.

You might be interested in
Please answer quick! ill give brainly.
arsen [322]

Answer:  I think it was A. I might be wrong

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did network television news reports from the front lines affect the American people during the war in Vietnam? A Confidence
makkiz [27]

i believe the answer is d

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At its height, the kingdom of axum expanded
allsm [11]

Answer:

round 100 CE, reaching its peak around 350 CE.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
people ability to express their will varies depending on their country's form of government. how do the governments of japan, no
MissTica

The full answerisin the document attached, this is just a preview since there is a character limit.

Psragraph...

After analyzing the three states, there a lot of conclusions that can be made. First of all, these states have a division of power. There are different organs, responsible for ruling over different matters. Philippines, on one side, is a more liberal State on its formation; its constitution contains a bill of rights, belonging those to some universal principles, such as but not limited to, habeas corpus and due process. On the other hand, North Korea has division of power as well, being the Supreme People´s Assembly the legislative power, the Presidium, responsible for regulating the power and duties of the SPA, and administering Justice at a National level. People  in North Korea do have rights and liberties, for example, work, education and health are granted rights, there is freedom of speech and religion,  there are elections, and some others, but what makes a difference between this and the other states is that the basis of the exercise of these rights is collective, not individual and this can be a limitation.  

The advantages of the socialist system in North Korea is that in theory, there should not be differences between people, but most importantly, there is a spirit of modernism and transformation thru the state, that´s an interesting view and an advantage: the people, collectively will build the country, and take it to a perfect place for everyone thru science and education, which is free from kindergarten to university. But the main disadvantage is that this model is not compatible with the rest of the world and it drives the nation to isolation, because they base their model in cultural principles which are not negotiable, such as Chongsanri spirit, which in short words is a model of inspiring people to work for the nation´s sake, not for a material compensation, which in western societies might be taken as deeply unfair.

On the other hand, Japan´s model is certainly a western-like constitutional model and similar to the Philippines, being some of the advantages that Japan grants free education to all its citizens, something that does not happen in Philippines, as their bill of rights focuses on individual freedoms and those rights which regulate the relationship between the state and the individuals, for example, the right to a speedy trial or not to incriminate oneself. Japan declares peace is one of their fundamental principles and that is the reason why Japan resigned to war or to use force to solve any further conflict. This is an advantage, because for a country, resigning to war means to dedicate in other efforts for the good of their citizens.  

Type of Government...

Each country has both similarities and differences. The second ones are more related with the names of the organisms which intervene in the government process, but the main duties are quite the same. Constitutionally speaking, North Korea is not a dictatorship taking into account that everything in the country belongs to its citizens, and that people can be elected as early as 17 years old to any position in the government. But the leader represents the foundation of the country, hence the nation,  and the leader are somewhat blended, and this is the reason why this position is actually inherited, so this is certainly a dictatorship in the practice, although their Constitution says that everything belongs to everyone and that the real power are the people.

Japan is a constitutional monarchy. The Emperor represents the unity of the people, in short words, he rules only on behalf of the people, and that is actually the source of his power: people, not a divine rule as it was in the past, when he used to be the son of the sun or some kind of semi god.  He has the authority to sign regulations and decrees, for example, but there is a Prime Minister, head of the executive branch, who is the head of the government, and there is also a Supreme Court and a Diet, which has the duties of a congress, composed by two houses.

As of the Philippines, it is a democracy, a republican form of state with its power divided in three branches, in which the head of the state is the President and the judiciary is under the control of the Supreme Court and the legislative branch is in charge of the Congress and Senate.            

To what extent can the people participate in the governing process of each country?

The participation in politics is equally granted in each one of these states; in North Korea, people can be elected to local or national Assembly, that is a constitutional right, similarly as it happens in the Philippines and Japan, where the right to suffrage is granted in the Constitution. This certainly, can be undermined by different local factors, such as corruption, lack of political parties or difficulties to access to the government or influence in decisions taken.    

Classification...


had to write so much but hope this helped ;(

3 0
3 years ago
The rod cells in the retina contain a light-absorbing pigment called
fiasKO [112]

Explanation:

rhodopsin are the rod cells in the retina contain a light absorbing pigment...

Hope it helps

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 3. What is a myth? any long poem that tells a story a traditional tale about gods and heroes a false story that was written by t
    15·2 answers
  • Why did President Harry Truman decide to hit the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with two atomic bombs in 1945?
    13·2 answers
  • Why is Spanish dominant in the Americas?​
    15·2 answers
  • What is the total temperature change between 3 km 7 km above Earth's surface
    9·1 answer
  • Please help me and not fake it
    9·1 answer
  • 38 1 point Which was NOT a cause of Latin American Revolutions? O the Congress of Vienna the successes of the American and Frenc
    5·1 answer
  • EASY 30 POINTS PLEASE HELP!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of principle of checks and balances in the constitution?
    10·2 answers
  • The city of New York was originally founded by the And was know as
    7·1 answer
  • What were the views of philosophers about bringing changes in society? DURING FRENCH REVOLUTION​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!