Explanation:
Some body is there in the room. (into negative )
Answer
C. this country has both dictatorship and monarchy.
Explanation:
Because that country will most likely be a religious country and and the people would be forced to be in that religion
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
Answer:
"Among them was the right of the church to be free from governmental interference, the rights of all free citizens to own and inherit property and to be protected from excessive taxes."
Southern governments which wanted to rebuild their cities after the war.
Answer: Option 1.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Republican Congress built up military areas in the South and utilized Army work force to oversee the locale until new governments faithful to the Union—that acknowledged the Fourteenth Amendment and the privilege of freedmen to cast a ballot—could be set up.
These military districts were built up in the southern part of the country and they were built till the time the new government came up in the region and gave the region the right to vote.