Answer:
Proof in explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm going to attempt this by squeeze theorem.
We know that 
is a variable number between -1 and 1 (inclusive).
This means that 
.
for all value 
. So if we multiply all sides of our inequality by this, it will not effect the direction of the inequalities.
By squeeze theorem, if
and 
, then we can also conclude that 
.
So we can actually evaluate the "if" limits pretty easily since both are continuous and exist at 
.
.
We can finally conclude that 
by squeeze theorem.
Some people call this sandwich theorem.
Answer: Sorry I forgot about this, I really didn’t learn anything this year but my best guess is... ( A )
The two numbers are 3 and 12.
I got these numbers by factoring 36.
1 * 36 sum : 37
2 * 18 sum : 20
3 * 12 sum : 15
It is easier to find the factor of a number and solve for the sum. Than to find the addends of a number and solve for the product.
There are 9 factors of 36 while 14 addends of 15.
Answer: B (1, 35)
Step-by-step explanation:
For each ordered pair, the first number would be t, and the second number would be d(t). We need to find one that satisfies the equation. When we multiply 1 by 35, do we get 35? Yes.
