1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
baherus [9]
3 years ago
6

How do political party, corporation, advocacy group, lobbyist, media group, Internet companies, and other politicians and former

government officials take away from or give power to citizens? How does this limit the power of the people to keep politicians and government accountable?
History
1 answer:
Dmitriy789 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Political parties give power to the citizens when they join the interests of many individuals and social groups in the political arena. They take power away from the citizens when they become corporations mostly interested in preserving their own power.

Corporations and lobbysts take power away from citizens when they pool money to politicians in order to influence policy.

Media takes power away from citizens when they become biased and push agendas. They give power to the citizens when they deliver objective and important information to the public. The same is true for internet companies.

Finally, other politicians and former government officials take power away from citizens whey they use their political power to influence policy in an unfair manner. They do the opposite (give power to the citizens), when they influence policy in a fair manner.

How does this limit the power of the people to keep politicians and government accountable?

The influence of these interest groups can lead policies in ways that are not agreed upon by the citizens. In other words, these interest groups can subvert democracy, making citizens feel that their votes and opinions do not matter.

You might be interested in
Helpppppp meeeeeeeee
aev [14]

Answer:

part 1. 3 + 2 +2+=7

part 2. 2+2+2+2 +3 +3=14

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Despite the legal segregation, were african americans readily hired after executive order 9980? explain.
GREYUIT [131]

Despite the legal segregation African-Americans were not immediately and readily hired after Presidents Truman's executive order 9980. This was because most people from the south still bear grudges against the  abolitionism, Reconstruction and Abraham Lincoln.

<h3>What is an Executive Order?</h3>

An Executive order is a directive from the Executive branch of government which is deemed as legally binding without seeking backing from the legislative arm of government.

 

   An executive order carries the full weight of the law. The idea of executive order is to forestall any hindrance due to time constraint in seeking approval from the legislature.

<h3>What was Executive Order 9980</h3>

Executive Order 9980 authorized the establishment of review boards within federal executive departments and agencies to which employees claiming racially discriminatory treatment could appeal.

   This was one of the landmark achievements of president Harry Truman to end racial segregation in the military and  in federal workforce.

Learn more about executive order 9980 brainly.com/question/2331911

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
What was the result of the interaction between Spain and the Philippine islands in 1565? Question 18 options: The Spanish conque
Tema [17]

Answer:

The spanish conquered most of the islands!

Explanation: i got the answer key

3 0
3 years ago
Knowing what he knew at the time, did President Truman make the right decision in using the atomic bomb on Japan? Why or why not
kkurt [141]

Answer:

President Truman did not make the right choice regarding the atomic bomb droppings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. ... Truman had the right to use the bombs but only after he gave the Japanese a chance at surrender and even then he should have only used one in the most extreme case.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
South Africa became a democracy when a new constitution took effect in ________.
Thepotemich [5.8K]
The current constitution of South Africa has been created in 1996 and took effect in 1997. But the way to a democracy in RSA has been paved after the fall of Apartheid in 1994.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did Mexico win it’s independence from Spain
    10·1 answer
  • Who betrayed Anne Frank?
    5·2 answers
  • In contrast to Medieval art, paintings during the Renaissance were ____________.
    15·2 answers
  • If it is what propaganda technique does it use
    6·1 answer
  • 4. What can be inferred about the relationship between Orthodox Christians and Muslims at the time of
    13·2 answers
  • 10. Why were the colonists mad about the Tea Act of 1773 even though it reduced the
    10·1 answer
  • How did political machines meet the social needs of the people? (3 ways)
    13·1 answer
  • What social and scientific events from World War
    7·1 answer
  • How would you characterize Wilson’s approach to civil rights?
    14·1 answer
  • Dude whats the difference between past and passed
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!