Answer: The people have the burden of proving the defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
Explanation:
The Constitution protects Joe in this situation by requiring that he be treated with the same rights as citizens of California according to Section 2 of Article IV.
<h3>Section 2 of Article IV </h3>
- Outlines the rights and priviledges of citizens in various states.
- States that citizens of the U.S. will have the same rights in a state as citizens of that state.
Joe therefore has the same rights as a California citizen which means that the police have to help him in this situation.
Find out more on Article IV at brainly.com/question/1115164.
Answer: Yes. The motel within its rights to refuse her admittance
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Manpreet reserved a room at the Moonlight Motel but couldn't later travel and therefore called her sister, Ravinder, to make use of the motel room in her place.
We are further told that Ravinder was refused admittance to the room on the grounds that there was a waiting list and she was not on it.
Based on the nice scenario, the motel was within its rights to refuse her admittance. It should be noted that the hotel room wasn't booked in her name but rather booked in Manpreet's name. The thing that Manpreet could have done is to inform the motel when she realize that she couldn't come and change the terms of the contract by saying her sister will be coming. But in this scenario, the motel is within its rights to refuse her admittance.
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
By examining unique striations, scratches left behind on the bullet and weapon, individual fired rounds can be, but not always are, linked back to a specific weapon. These striations are due to the rifling inside the barrel of handguns. Rifling spins the bullet when it is shot out of the barrel to improve accuracy.
