Which of the following is NOT a reason for implementing Intermediate Sanctions?

Law

1 answer:

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty

Explanation:

Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.

The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.

You might be interested in

The estimated economic cost of alcohol-impaired-driving crashes in the United States in 2010 (the most recent year for which cos

den301095 [7]

Answer:

$44 billion.

Explanation:

Alcohol-impaired-driving crashes are automobile crashes caused as a result of a driver driving under the influence of alcohol, especially when he exceeds the daily allowed average, BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration), which is 0.8g/deciliter.

This implies that it is illegal and a punishable offense for a driver of any kind of motor vehicle to continue driving when his blood alcohol concentration is above the allowed limit.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following amendments would protect you in the scenario found in the following question?

ANEK [815]

That would go against the 10th amendment say states make their own laws

3 0

3 years ago

What is the approximate time of death if the body temperature was 60.1°F?

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

43 Hours

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is article 12 in the UAE law book?

Snezhnost [94]

Idk the answer sorry

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How might race, class, and gender differences in offending be explained by criminological theory?

NikAS [45]

Answer:

Simple!! Profiling!

Explanation:

Tons say that felons are discriminated and profiled negatively based on their race, class, gender, AND appearance. If law enforcement were to see someone with tattoos, that person has a chance of being criminally profiled in a negative way. It's the same for if you see a southern, black, hispanic, or Arabic felon. Yes, I have to say, they are interrogated fairly, but I would say law enforcement is stereotypical of the people in which they arrest. You're welcome!

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers