1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
evablogger [386]
2 years ago
12

Which of the following is NOT a reason for implementing Intermediate Sanctions?

Law
1 answer:
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty

Explanation:

Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.

The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.

You might be interested in
8. What is the process of identifying psychological and social characteristics surrounding the crime as well as the manner in wh
melomori [17]
C. psychological profiling
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summarize Arizona v Evans
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrant less search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Is the following statement true or false?
bogdanovich [222]

Answer:it is false i just did the question

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
The unknown informant called the city of calbayog city police station to relay the information that the accused was going to cat
Jlenok [28]

YES that is very illegal

8 0
2 years ago
In what situations would a defendant be wise to take a plea deal? Why do you think a prosecutor want to make a plea bargain offe
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

If they feel like they are going to get out in prison or if they think that they are about to be proven guilty. they may make a plea deal so they can get the defendants help if they know something the prosecutor needs to know for the case.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sebutkan latar belakang dari mosi Sekolah daring masa pandemi ini mengurangi efektifitas belakar siswa!
    10·1 answer
  • If a nation's economy is based primarily on businesses that produce goods rather than services, what would you expect to be true
    12·1 answer
  • Alcohol has many sensations and effects like:______
    15·2 answers
  • (blank) officers are most likely to suffer injuries in a vehicle accident during high-speed car chases when trying to nab a crim
    6·1 answer
  • What is the final step for a bill to become a law?
    6·2 answers
  • What makes administrative law different from other types of law?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the colonists respond to the Intolerable Acts of 1774?
    6·1 answer
  • The chart above outlines the relationships central to a social contract. The Declaration of Independence was an action best desc
    14·2 answers
  • What are the three levels of court in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Auto insurance is: A) required by law B) required in a few states C) optional if your car and house are paid off D) an optional
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!