Answer:
the answer is lincoln capital l as well
Explanation:
<span>I
think that the positives of partisanship is that the incumbent political leader
will have the (1) unwavering support from his cohorts with regards to the
projects, programs or laws that he/she will be implementing (2) their
aspirations and objectives are aligned which helps in catalyzing in the changes
that they may want to implement in the government or administration and (3) its
identity can endure simply because it is strengthened by affiliating itself to
gender, ethnic, religious and racial groups thus promoting a connection to a
party which eventually generates political stability and diminish political
influence by independents or nonpartisans. On the downside, partisanship may
(1) promote divisiveness especially if its advocacies are met with great
opposition by the non-cohorts and (2) there will be bias especially if
arguments are thrown against them which leads to the scrutiny of the opposing
views at a greater degree just to refute the said argument.</span>
<span>The elimination of foreign influences</span>
<span>Because those who weren't all for the Jacobin cause were thought to be secret royalists or whatever and their presense was a threat to the Committee and the Jaobins in charge. Robespierre and his allies who basically afraid and did whatever they could to ensure their grip on power was tight, obviously it did not work</span>
