So basically writing it as a fraction in 5 over 8 practically means 5 divided by 8. so then 0.625 actually IS ALREADY the decimal
Answer:
b) repetition
I feel this is the correct option.
The grammatical name given to the expression, "Officials of the Lagos state environmental task force and special offenses unit" is- it is a Noun phrase. It is the subject of the verb.
- A noun—a word (or phrase) that names a person, place, or thing—is typically used as the subject.
- Nouns combined with modifiers make up noun phrases.
- Noun phrases can serve as subjects, objects, and prepositional objects just like nouns can.
- Similar to adjectives, participles, infinitives, and prepositional or absolute phrases, noun phrases can also function as these in a sentence.
- Noun phrases are crucial for giving a noun additional context.
- The verb (or predicate), which describes an activity or a state of being, is typically used after the subject.
Learn more about nouns from here-
brainly.com/question/5372296
#SPJ10
A=Edgar Poe didn't write "just anything" that would sell. If he did that, we probably wouldn't have ever heard of him for several reasons which are ultimately unimporatant to this question.
B=He claimed his first love was poetry, and he considered himself a poet before a regular, ordinary writer, but given the way the choices are worded, I'd say that B is still, with this in consideration, not the answer.
C=Edgar Poe did fabricate his personal life one time, when he created a backstory for his alias Arthur Gordon Pym.
D=True, he did invent it before Sir Arthur Conan Doyle ripped off Poe's detective C. Auguste Dupin.
E=Edgar Allan Poe was never insane. He was not that kind of man. He was more philosophical and aristocratic. Although in his youth he had toyed with an alcohol vice, he overcame it in his later years. He is only (and falsely) known for an alcoholic past because after Poe died, Poe's editor, Rufus Griswald slandered Poe and re-wrote Poe's biography, altering history away from the truth. Edgar Poe was never the "madman-alcoholic" that some people wrongfully believe he was.
Answer:
deconstruction, form of philosophical and literary analysis, derived mainly from work begun in the 1960s by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida, that questions the fundamental conceptual distinctions, or “oppositions,” in Western philosophy through a close examination of the language and logic of philosophical and literary texts. In the 1970s the term was applied to work by Derrida, Paul de Man, J. Hillis Miller, and Barbara Johnson, among other scholars. In the 1980s it designated more loosely a range of radical theoretical enterprises in diverse areas of the humanities and social sciences, including—in addition to philosophy and literature—law, psychoanalysis, architecture, anthropology, theology, feminism, gay and lesbian studies, political theory, historiography, and film theory. In polemical discussions about intellectual trends of the late 20th-century, deconstruction was sometimes used pejoratively to suggest nihilism and frivolous skepticism. In popular usage the term has come to mean a critical dismantling of tradition and traditional modes of thought.
Deconstruction in philosophy
Explanation:
