Without adjectives, we could not describe things. Color would be less precious to us: there would be cars, but not red cars or blue cars or black cars. In describing a cat to someone who’s never owned a cat, all you could say is, “A cat is an animal with ears and a tail.” You couldn’t explain its soft fur or sharp claws.
Answer:
The statement is OK.
Explanation:
Checking whether there is a case of plagiarism in an academic paper in the MLA format, the given statement is from one of the student samples provided alongside the passage.
The given passage/ statement mentions how Salman Rushdie finds the scene of The Wizard of Oz. This student sample of the text provides a given opinion of the famed writer, which may act as one of the sources of the academic research paper. And by indicating the quoted words with the (" ") symbol, there is no case of plagiarism. Rather, this is the correct way of stating a given line when quoted from another source. So, the given student sample is free from any plagiarism issues.
I'd choose this dialogue to revise your sentence:
<span>“Did you hear?” I asked them. “My painting got selected! Exciting, right?” I smiled. “Especially given that I felt so incompetent at the beginning and that the competition was ruthless!”
</span>
It feels like the option that best uses the dialogue to improve this sentence, because the other options are either too informal or just the same sentence as the original one.
that fourth of july should not be celebrated by black because we (blacks) did not gain independence from slavery
The irony is that Tom is more educated then Huck, but makes it very complicated to free Jim, instead of doing it the simple way.
