1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kipish [7]
4 years ago
8

How did the romans impact agriculture?

History
1 answer:
yanalaym [24]4 years ago
7 0
KD White's Roman Farming compiles information from Roman authors and addresses all aspects of Roman agriculture using detailed charts of soils, agricultural terms
You might be interested in
How has American drama developed?
PtichkaEL [24]
Dramas have developed from plays to onscreen
3 0
3 years ago
What did Lincoln do to provoke war?
Reptile [31]
Southern leaders of the Civil War period placed the blame for the outbreak of fighting squarely on Lincoln<span>. They accused the President of acting aggressively towards the South and of deliberately provoking war in order to overthrow the Confederacy. For its part, the Confederacy sought a peaceable accommodation of its legitimate claims to independence, and resorted to measures of self-defence only when threatened by Lincoln's coercive policy. Thus, Confederate vice president, Alexander H. Stephens, claimed that the war was "inaugurated by Mr. Lincoln." Stephens readily acknowledged that General </span>Beauregard's troops fired the "first gun." But, he argued, the larger truth is that "in personal or national conflicts, it is not he who strikes the first blow, or fires the first gun that inaugurates or begins the conflict." Rather, the true aggressor is "the first who renders force necessary."

Stephens identified the beginning of the war as Lincoln's order sending a "hostile fleet, styled the 'Relief Squadron'," to reinforce Fort Sumter. "The war was then and there inaugurated and begun by the authorities at Washington. General Beauregard did not open fire upon Fort Sumter until this fleet was, to his knowledge, very near the harbor of Charleston, and until he had inquired of Major Anderson . . . whether he would engage to take no part in the expected blow, then coming down upon him from the approaching fleet . . . When Major Anderson . . .would make no such promise, it became necessary for General Beauregard to strike the first blow, as he did; otherwise the forces under his command might have been exposed to two fires at the same time-- one in front, and the other in the rear." The use of force by the Confederacy , therefore, was in "self-defence," rendered necessary by the actions of the other side.

Jefferson Davis, who, like Stephens, wrote his account after the Civil War, took a similar position. Fort Sumter was rightfully South Carolina's property after secession, and the Confederate government had shown great "forbearance" in trying to reach an equitable settlement with the federal government. But the Lincoln administration destroyed these efforts by sending "a hostile fleet" to Sumter. "The attempt to represent us as the aggressors," Davis argued, "is as unfounded as the complaint made by the wolf against the lamb in the familiar fable. He who makes the assault is not necessarily he that strikes the first blow or fires the first gun."

From Davis's point of view, to permit the strengthening of Sumter, even if done in a peaceable manner, was unacceptable. It meant the continued presence of a hostile threat to Charleston. Further, although the ostensible purpose of the expedition was to resupply, not reinforce the fort, the Confederacy had no guarantee that Lincoln would abide by his word. And even if he restricted his actions to resupply in this case, what was to prevent him from attempting to reinforce the fort in the future? Thus, the attack on Sumter was a measure of "defense." To have acquiesced in the fort's relief, even at the risk of firing the first shot, "would have been as unwise as it would be to hesitate to strike down the arm of the assailant, who levels a deadly weapon at one's breast, until he has actually fired."

In the twentieth century, this critical view of Lincoln's actions gained a wide audience through the writings of Charles W. Ramsdell and others. According to Ramsdell, the situation at Sumter presented Lincoln with a series of dilemmas. If he took action to maintain the fort, he would lose the border South and a large segment of northern opinion which wanted to conciliate the South. If he abandoned the fort, he jeopardized the Union by legitimizing the Confederacy. Lincoln also hazarded losing the support of a substantial portion of his own Republican Party, and risked appearing a weak and ineffective leader.

Lincoln could escape these predicaments, however, if he could induce southerners to attack Sumter, "to assume the aggressive and thus put themselves in the wrong in the eyes of the North and of the world." By sending a relief expedition, ostensibly to provide bread to a hungry garrison, Lincoln turned the tables on the Confederates, forcing them to choose whether to permit the fort to be strengthened, or to act as the aggressor. By this "astute strategy," Lincoln maneuvered the South into firing the first shot.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Aztecs engage in human sacrifice?
slega [8]

Answer:

B.  to keep their chief god strong

Explanation:

The Aztec believed that they owed everything to the gods who created themselves as well as the world around them. The would perform sacrifices in order for a good crop yield or good weather among other things. They believed that the best way to repay them was to offer up blood to them in regular rituals.

3 0
3 years ago
Congressional powers include which of the following? Select all that apply.
Furkat [3]

Answer:

Congressional powers include (from the list):- Coining money.- Override a presidential veto.- Making laws.Hope this helps!

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
50 point!!! Please help me this!!!!
Vanyuwa [196]

Question:

Who was Daniel Shays?

Answer:

Daniel Shays was an American soldier, revolutionary and farmer famous for being one of the leaders and namesake of Shays' Rebellion, a populist uprising against controversial debt collection and tax policies in Massachusetts in 1786 and 1787.

Question:

What was Shays' Rebellion?

Answer:

Shays' Rebellion was an armed uprising in Western Massachusetts and Worcester in response to a debt crisis among the citizenry and in opposition to the state government's increased efforts to collect taxes both on individuals and their trades; the fight took place mostly in and around Springfield during 1786 and 1787.

Question:

How did Shays' Rebellion lead to the Constitutional Convention?

Answer:

Shays’ Rebellion was one of several critical events that led to the calling of a Constitutional Convention the following year in Philadelphia. Daniel Shays, a former Continental Army captain, led a group of <u>upset western Massachusetts residents who were upset about the way the state government was handling wartime debt and high taxes.</u>

<u />

Question:

What was the result of the Constitutional Convention?

Answer:

As history played out, the result of the Constitutional Convention was the United States Constitution, but it wasn't an easy path. The drafting process was grueling. They wanted the supreme law of the United States to be perfect.

The first two months of the Convention saw fierce debate over the 15 points of the "Virginia Plan" which had been proposed by Madison as an upgrade to the Articles of Confederation. Yet, the "Committee of the Whole" couldn't agree on anything. So, on July 24 of that year, the Committee of Detail was enacted to handle the drafting process.

The United States (U.S.) Constitution was adopted on September 17, 1787 with 39 signatures before being distributed to the States for ratification.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which amendment is not described correctly?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the portuguese gain control of most of southern asia sea trade?
    12·1 answer
  • The Indian Appropriations Act of 1871 encouraged assimilation with the provision that
    14·2 answers
  • What is a result of Thomas Gallaudet contribution to education?
    11·1 answer
  • If you were a reform-minded person who above all loaded the social problems associated with alcohol you would have been especial
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement about John James Audubon is true?
    6·2 answers
  • Proposition 187, approved by California voters in 1994: A. reinstated the bracero program and solved many of its immigration pro
    7·1 answer
  • Which delegate goes back to his home state to die from cancer?
    11·1 answer
  • Why was Pike's report so important to the Americans?
    10·2 answers
  • Help me answer these questions, they’re my last questions!
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!