It was said that Miss Stephanie tells the kids that Bob Ewell stropped Atticus and decided to spit in his face and told him that he, Bob, would get revenge back on Atticus in the near future.
The faulty logic in this sentence is an example of an either-or-fallacy. Given the construction of this type of fallacy it posits that the potential outcomes of a situation are usually a singular event such as in this example the only result is a prolonged strike and it will be economically crippling, this may happen but a variety of options could happen as well.
Answer: Beowulf is sympathetic to the humans, while Grendel shows the monster’s perspective; Beowulf is a contemporary version of an old tale, while Grendel is based on oral tradition.
Explanation:
Both works are written in an Old English poetic style: There is just one work - <u>Beowulf;</u>
<u></u>
Beowulf characterizes Grendel as bloodthirsty, but Grendel shows Grendel’s gentler side. - Grendel is a monster;
<u></u>
Beowulf is sympathetic to the humans, while Grendel shows the monster’s perspective. Yes, it is a monster;
Both works focus primarily on the hero, Beowulf. - There is just one work - <u>Beowulf;</u>
Beowulf is a contemporary version of an old tale, while Grendel is based on oral tradition. - Beowulf is the hero of the work; Grendel in Norse mythology, Grendel is a monstrous character.
Answer: Counter-productive work behavior
Explanation: Counterproductive work behavior is used to describe actions or attitude attributed to employees of an organization which could impede the productivity or growth of an organization. Counterproductive work behavior may include tardiness, fraud or other acts which could negatively affect the productivity. Counterproductive behavior negates moral and organizational ethics and may occur as a means of avenging an unfair treatment or to avoid getting into trouble as in the case of Daniel who opted for giving a below par presentation to clients rather than abstaining from work and getting into trouble with his boss.
