The main concern of the colonists after defeating the British quickly became the issue of the Constitution--whether to ratify it or not. A huge debate ensued between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.
In his most famous piece of work, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli basically wrote a manual on the types of existing principalities, poiniting out the difference between each of them, on the foundations of power and, finally, on the norms of conduct that the one who aspires to be prince must adopt.
According to the author, it was not enough to achieve power; the prince should be able to keep it, and to do so, he would have to be respected by the people, acting accordingly to each circumstance, changing strategies as appropriate. The most famous saying that synthesizes the Machiavellian though is "The ends justify the means", which means that in order to remain in the custody of power (which would be the "end"), the prince is authorized to act in the most convenient manner, not necessarily needing to stick to rigid moral principles and ethical norms.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. Colonies that went against England should <span>obey all laws. No one is being exempted in following the rules. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
<span>The Egyptian Arab historian al-Maqrīzī wrote in the 15th century that the nose
was actually destroyed by a Sufi Muslim named Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr.
In 1378 CE, Egyptian peasants made offerings to the Great Sphinx in the hope of controlling the flood cycle, which would result in a successful harvest. Please mark as Brainliest.
</span>
It would be the country of "China" that <span>Japan invaded in 1931 and again in 1938, since Japan is a small island nation and they needed more natural resources and territory. </span>
