Tanika was self-reference effect using to help her encode and remember the information.
<h3>What is the self-reference effect?</h3>
This can be described as the ability that people have to better remember information because they have linked the information to themselves.
This is what Tanika does here by thinking of applying the suggestions to herself.
Read more on memory here:
brainly.com/question/25040884
#SPJ1
Answer:
more than likely true
Explanation:
this is more likely to be true than false, given that we have so much waste that pours into different places. Take a look at what surrounds the Ganges River and if its possible for waste to get there.
Answer:
The Axis Power's Growing Power
Offmind's Explanation:
Germany and Italy were beginning to build a bigger aliance, (called the axis powers) which would be something big. The axis powers were already planning to take over the western powers because they were growing in power fast. Hitler was leading Germany and he promised Italy that he would help them grow in power because, well they weren't exactly what you would call valid during that time. Anyways, Germany was beginning to influence other powers to join their cause and the Axis Powers (Germany, Italy, Japan, etc...) were against the Western States ideas so it was definitely a time to fear them and their attacks during that time.
I can't say much for the Soviet Union/ USSR because while they were an ally they were also against some of the Western States Ideas as well....
If this helped you, Please consider marking Brainliest
Thanks!
-<em>Offmind</em>
I believe the answer is: Basic human nature is full of kindness.
Frank believe that Humans are naturally born full of sympathy that push us to treat each other with kindness. But in some cases, difficult situations often endanger the life of those humans and the people that they care about, which clouded their decision and drive them to do bad things.
Gettier's paper used counterexamples <span> to argue that there are cases of beliefs that are both true and justified—therefore satisfying all three conditions for knowledge on the JTB account—but that do not appear to be genuine cases of knowledge. Gettier, therefore, argued that his counterexamples show that the JTB account of knowledge is false—and thus, that a different conceptual analysis is needed to correctly track what we mean by "knowledge".</span>
