I definitely can't answer for your personality lol<span />
Both the stories are talking about education as a way of understanding, bridging the gap and enlightening people.
Explanation:
Both of these stories deal with fundamental theme of providing education of something to a people who do not have access to it.
“Teaching Shakespeare in a Maximum Security Prison” and “Village Schools and Traveling Soldiers" both are about people who are in either an undesirable position or in a difficult position and often do not get to study enough.
This is shown as a way to bridge the gap between them and the society and making them more enlightened. It is also about understanding their position as a people.
The argument that is most likely to have influenced the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school is A. The Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the fundamental rights of a person that is protected by law to make his own choices.
Hence, we can see that based on the original decision by the lower courts, they said the school was right to suspend the students, but the main argument that overturned this decision is that fact that the Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
Read more about human rights here:
brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
Repetition, reasons why, consistency, social proof, comparisons, and address objections
