The answer here is that you should have put a question for me to answer.
The case arises between the states of Georgia and Florida relating to the flow of toxins from factories in Georgia to the water system of Florida. This dispute is handled by the Federal judicial branch.
Option D is the correct answer.
<h3>What is a judiciary branch?</h3>
The judiciary branch is the third tier of the federal government which is accountable for monitoring the implemented laws by the executive branch.
The provided case is initiated between two states, that is, Florida and Georgia in connection with the problem of increasing amounts of toxins in the water system of Florida due to pollutants released from the factories of Georgia. The case could not be resolved by the state legislatures of both the states and is heard and resolved by the federal branch of the judiciary.
Therefore, the provided case should be heard by the federal branch of the judiciary regarding the quarrel between two states.
Learn more about the judiciary branch in the related link:
brainly.com/question/1344523
#SPJ1
James Madison because of he helped draft and ratify it.
hope this helps :)
In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
