1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bulgar [2K]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following BEST describes the difference between the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security? A. The Department

of Defense is mainly responsible for protecting US borders, while the Department of Homeland Security manages military operations abroad. B. The Department of Homeland security assists in counterterrorism measures, while the Department of Defense secures US borders from illegal immigration. C. The Department of Defense manages the military overseas, while the Department of Homeland security manages and trains the military on US soil. D. The Department of Defense manages military operations and training, while the Department of Homeland Security educates and assists Americans in preventing terrorist attacks on US soil.
History
2 answers:
In-s [12.5K]3 years ago
8 0
<span>the answer is D.The Department of Defense manages military operations and training, while the Department of Homeland Security educates and assists Americans in preventing terrorist attacks on US soil.
The departement of defense will take control of defense operation if United States wanted to directly involved, meanwhile the Departement of Homeland Security tend to be more secretive in its operation

</span>
Sloan [31]3 years ago
7 0
The answer is d .:......
You might be interested in
why has increasing farm production failed to help prevent malnutrition and famine in developing nations?A. most of those increas
PSYCHO15rus [73]

The correct answer would be alternative A) "most of those increases in agriculture are cash crops reserved for export."

The increase of production of crops doesn't benefit the hungry, as the crops are not meant for them. They're destined to exportation. For this reason, the hungry don't get anything from the increase in production.

One of the ways to prevent hunger in developing countries would be to have this crops used for social programs, and distribute food to the hungry. However, that's not the way it's done.

6 0
3 years ago
What sparked Native Americans in Tejas to attack Spanish settlements?
Dmitrij [34]

To meet the American demand for livestock, the Comanche turned to raiding the area around San Antonio. The Spanish government believed that security would come with a larger population, but was unable to attract colonists from Spain or from other New World colonies.

4 0
3 years ago
Each city-state could have its own government. Why was that able to happen?
hoa [83]

Answer:

Some city states were monarchies ruled by kings or tyrants. Others were oligarchies ruled by a few powerful men on councils. The city of Athens invented the government of democracy and was ruled by the people for many years.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Courts decide points of law, not points of fact.
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

the supreme courts decide points of law, some cases that prove this are

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Established supremacy of the U.S. Constitution and federal laws over state laws

United States v. Lopez (1995) Congress may not use the commerce clause to make possession of a gun in a school zone a

federal crime

LOR-2: Provisions of the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights are continually being interpreted to balance the power of government

and the civil liberties of individuals.

Engel v. Vitale (1962) School sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade violates the free exercise clause

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) Public school students have the right to wear black

armbands in school to protest the Vietnam War

New York Times Co. v. United States (1971) Bolstered the freedom of the press, establishing a “heavy presumption against

prior restraint” even in cases involving national security

Schenck v. United States (1919) Speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected by the First Amendment

LOR-3: Protections of the Bill of Rights have been selectively incorporated by way of the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process

clause to prevent state infringement of basic liberties.

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Guaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent in a state felony case

Roe v. Wade (1973) Extended the right of privacy to a woman’s decision to have an abortion

McDonald v. Chicago (2010) The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is applicable to the states

PRD-1: The 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause as well as other constitutional provisions have often been used to

support the advancement of equality.

Brown v. Board of Education (1954) Race-based school segregation violates the equal protection clause PRD-2: The impact of

federal policies on campaigning and electoral rules continues to be contested by both sides of the political spectrum.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) Political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a

form of protected speech under the First Amendment CON-3: The republican ideal in the U.S. is manifested in the structure

and operation of the legislative branch.

Baker v. Carr (1961) Opened the door to equal protection challenges to redistricting and the development of the “one person,

one vote” doctrine by ruling that challenges to redistricting did not raise “political questions” that would keep federal courts

from reviewing such challenges

Shaw v. Reno (1993) Majority minority districts, created under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, may be constitutionally

challenged by voters if race is the only factor used in creating the district CON-5: The design of the judicial branch protects the

Supreme Court’s independence as a branch of government, and the emergence and use of judicial review remains a powerful

judicial practice.

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the principle of judicial review empowering the Supreme Court to nullify an act of the

legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution

4 0
3 years ago
Why did Anderson move to Fort
zlopas [31]

Answer:

the answer is A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the goal in creating the Joint Chiefs of Staff?
    13·1 answer
  • What three major ways did England's war for empire impacted the colonies in north america?
    11·1 answer
  • How did Theodore Roosevelt use big stick diplomacy to construct the Panama Canal?
    10·2 answers
  • Categorize the locations based on whether they were sites of Allied or Japanese victories.
    9·2 answers
  • this is not a question just thanks I'm happy with brainly everyone. thank you for helping me out thanks everyone
    15·2 answers
  • What did the Citizens participated in the government of Athen
    7·1 answer
  • The largest city in contemporary timeshift between all of the following except which one
    5·1 answer
  • The Trail of Tears was a(n)
    13·1 answer
  • The U.S. states on the continent of North America (excluding Alaska) are called the
    13·2 answers
  • Type your response in the box. What are two computerized geographical tools or technologies that geographers use to help them wi
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!