<u>Answer:
</u>
The effect that the creation of decentralized boards and districts outside the authority of the governor had on the Texas government was that it helped in the creation of a system that was responsive to special interests.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The decentralization of boards and districts enabled the distribution of powers which was now penetrated down to lower authorities.
- The common public could reach these authorities easily and get their queries resolved.
- These authorities could easily address the special inclinations and interests of the public and take necessary actions to fulfill those as they now had the authority to make decisions for their subjects.
Answer: Cue-dependent forgetting
Explanation: Cue-dependent forgetting could be explained as a type of memory failure whereby an individual fails to recall an information from memory due to the absence of the stimulus or cue used or present at the time of encoding the information.
In the scenario above, Dr. Roger's is unable to remember or recall the name of his student most probably due to the fact that the stimulus present at the time of encoding the students name in memory isn't available, thus cue is probably the classroom environment, which explains why she immediately recalls the student's name when he sees her in class.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
There are so little evidences of what lives were during the prehistoric era. Most of our sources come from the biological and archaeological evidences gathered by different people. However, it is quite clear that the lives of people before were entirely depending on thinking that good is rewarded by a heavenly entity. This is very different from the laws today because of our aim to be more logical in decision making, etc.
