1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marshall27 [118]
3 years ago
15

Did Harding show good leadership of the country

History
1 answer:
Fed [463]3 years ago
4 0
Warren Gamaliel Harding (November 2, 1865 – August 2, 1923) was the 29th president of the United States from 1921 until his death in 1923. A member of the Republican Party, he was one of the most popular U.S. presidents to that point. ... He is often rated as one of the worst presidents in historical rankings.


The Teapot Dome scandal was a bribery scandal involving the administration of United States President Warren G. Harding from 1921 to 1923. Harding administration passed the Emergency Tariff Act in the year 1921. ... The Emergency Tariff of 1921, increased rates on wheat, sugar, meat, wool and other agricultural products brought into the United States from foreign nations.


Most historians rank Harding as the worst of all American Presidents. Recently, some revisionists see him as an important transitional figure whose easy-going ways helped bridge the gap between Wilsonian idealism and the business prosperity of the Coolidge and Hoover years. Harding is also given some credit for his progressive views on race and civil rights.

Neither a deep thinker, nor a decisive President, Harding failed, in most opinions, to impact the nation simply because he saw the role of President as largely ceremonial. He saw himself as neither a caretaker nor as a leader. He just avoided issues whenever possible.

Unlike other modern Presidents, such as Ronald Reagan, who possessed conventional minds and who thought simply, Harding never understood where he wanted to take the nation. Nor could he communicate his message effectively, because he had none to communicate. He spoke about a "return to normalcy," but he had no idea what this slogan meant. Lacking the moral compass of a Reagan, Harding had no guide to follow. He was lucky to have had a few good men in his cabinet who generally ran fiscal and foreign affairs well.

In the end, it was not his corrupt friends that tarnished his legacy and undermined his historical impact. Rather, it was his own lack of vision and his poor sense of priorities that positioned him so low in the ranking of U.S. Presidents. Then, too, it was Harding's sad fate to have followed in office the most visionary of all our Presidents, Woodrow Wilson, the man whom historians generally rank among the top five or six Presidents in the nation's history.
You might be interested in
All answer choices are <br> 1. judicial<br> 2. legislative<br> 3. executive
maxonik [38]
The legislative branch makes the laws, the executive branch carries out the laws, and the judicial branch sees if laws are constitutional or not!

So it goes in order or Legislative, Executive, then Judicial! :)

Mark me as brainliest please
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Ark of the Covenant so holy to Jews?
slamgirl [31]
The correct answer would the third option c) they believed that God was inside the ark
4 0
3 years ago
In what ways was medieval Japan different from medieval Europe?<br><br> (No options to be chosen.)
Andru [333]
One way is that medieval Europe had knights to protect people and followed the code of chivalry and medieval Japan had samurai
6 0
3 years ago
In your opinion, has civil disobedience been successful in influencing politics?
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

Civil disobedience can be viewed by many as a weapon against injustice and cruelty. It enables people to help out others by standing up against their oppressors. It gives them an opportunity to allow someone a fair and just chance at life. It allowed people to end slavery in the United States, and wars in Mexico.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following did NOT occur as a result of the Spanish American War?
Fittoniya [83]

The United States was no longer viewed as a powerful nation.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Spanish–American War took place in the year of 1898 between Spain and United States of America. The Spanish-American war was started due to the explosive attack on the battleship USS Maine in Havana Harbor. The war went on for four months and came to an end after signing the Treaty of Paris.

The government of Spain and America signed this "<u>Treaty of Paris"</u> and made Cuba independent from Spain. America got the territories in the western Pacific and Latin America. So they expanded the foreign trade.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who wrote federalist 51?
    14·1 answer
  • A list of the weaknesses of the new government under the Articles of Confederation (taxation, printing money, click on people in
    10·1 answer
  • These are all describing which international group? A) Red Cross B) United Nations C) Organization of American States D) North A
    15·2 answers
  • What company is known as the earliest corporation to set up settlements in south africa
    12·1 answer
  • Define Absolute Monarchy...
    10·1 answer
  • What are two provisions in the treaty of Versailles is going to anger Germany and eventually lead to WW2?
    11·1 answer
  • Which US branch of government has the most members? legislative judicial executive
    15·1 answer
  • Manifest Destiny Perspectives Activity Choose between Document Set A or Document Set B. Closely read/examine all three sources i
    12·1 answer
  • A introduction to monarchy and explaining the ideals to your society
    11·1 answer
  • What were photographs such as this one taken by Lewis Hine primarily intended to accomplish
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!