Letting a person die is providing a person a release from death. It is as if he was suffering, and letting that person die is stopping his suffering, and letting him be at peace. He is no longer in the pain that death provides.
Bringing about a person's death, on the other hand, such as using a lethal injection on a person, is harming the person and putting him/her in pain. While in the other situation you are providing the person with relief, here, you are the one bringing about the person's pain.
But I believe that Rachel might think that letting a person die is much worse than causing the person pain because letting the person die if letting go of the person completely. You leave the person helpless, and as they are dying and screaming for your help, you just stand by and let it happen. You do nothing about it. You are simply a bystander, watching as said person slips into a wholly different reality altogether. Causing a person's death has a certain surety in it. You are causing a person's death, and you are probably doing it for a personal reason. There is a certain type of surety in causing a persons' death because you are the one causing it, while in the other situation, you are simply watching, letting it happen.
C. A shared sense of identity
Answer:
Karma is a Sanskrit word whose literal meaning is 'action'. It refers to the law that every action has an equal reaction either immediately or at some point in the future
Explanation:
Answer:
Congress recommended to the individual states to give the Loyalists back their land and properties.
Britain recognized the United States as an independent nation.
The U.S. received the land between the Mississippi and Atlantic north of Florida and south of Canada.
Britain will accept America as an independent country (should be obvious as the revolution just ended) is correct.
D) the cost for both plans are exactly the same for 500 text messages
