It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to answer this question so I had to look for it. Anyway, here is the answer. The step that <span>describes the responder's responsibility to protect him- or herself from injury at a weapons of mass destruction (WMD) incident is the ALL-HAZARD APPROACH. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
be able to open her own business.
Explanation:
The second of the four major caliphates which was established after the passing on (death) of prophet Muhammad, is known as the Umayyad caliphate. This caliphate was established or founded by the governor of Syria called Mu'awiya and it was ruled by a dynasty popularly referred to as Umayyad dynasty.
Furthermore, the capitals of the Umayyad caliphate were Harran and Damascus, wherein the type of government they practiced was monarchy.
An Umayyad woman would most likely be able to open her own business because they were largely from a merchant family of the tribe known as Quraysh found in Mecca.
Answer:
<u>The policies illustrated in excerpt above were most clearly contrary to Laisse-faire capitalism.</u>
Explanation:
“Laisse-Faire capitalism” advocates for business practices free from any government intervention or moderation (like privileges, tariffs, regulation, and subsidies), and holds that business should be driven only by the market forces. Roosevelt's policies, which sought to stabilize the US economy and protect the people, were contrary to this doctrine because they increased governmental intervention into the banking industry by supervising and regulating its practices.
Answer: The Constitution itself was written as a guideline for the government (as far as what it can and cannot do). The main point was to remind the citizens that the power is in the hands of the people, as we elect representatives, judges, etc.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Explanation:
It wasn't exactly disagreeable speech. The Supreme Court wrangled about the place of the American Flag in American life.
The core issue was whether or not desecration of the US flag is protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court's final decision was yes but only by a 5-4 margin.
So in effect disagreeable speech was upheld. Various attempts have been made to make burning of the flag just going a bit too far. All attempts have failed and the right to disagreeable speech has been upheld.
