In labeling theory, what is the difference between primary and secondary deviance?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Bingel [31]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

a. Secondary deviance is an eventual effect of primary deviance, where deviance begins.

Explanation:

In labelling theory, primary and secondary deviance are distinguished from each other. Primary deviance is considered to be the initial manifestation of deviance, while secondary deviance is considered the effect of primary deviance. These are also different in the way they are recognized. Primary deviance consists of deviant acts before they are publicly labelled, while secondary deviance occurs after diagnosis and labelling, and is often a reaction to the labelling itself.

You might be interested in

When anthropologists compare ancient artifacts from South America, Europe, and Australia they often find similarities among the

max2010maxim [7]

Answer:

the collective unconscious

Explanation:

The collective unconscious: The concept of collective unconscious was proposed by the famous psychoanalyst named Carl Jung and is also referred to as the objective psyche. According to Carl Jung, the collective unconscious is described as the aspects that a section or portion of the deepest unconscious mind isn't created through personal experience but rather it is being genetically inherited.

Carl Jung believed that an individual is unaware of the different items stored in his or her collective unconscious.

Example: the father-child or mother-child relationship.

7 0

3 years ago

Remodeling a kitchen to add additional cabinets to existing ones also means adding extra support. in a similar respect, bone rem

andreyandreev [35.5K]

The correct answer is Calcium

The question might be phrased in a complicated manner, but the answer is simple. Calcium is essential for bone support and strength which is why dairy products are highly important and should be consumed on a daily basis.

3 0

3 years ago

At first, the disputing parties resist your offer to help create a win-win situation for both groups. They are each highly focus

Andreyy89

Answer: At first, the disputing parties resist your offer to help create a win-win situation for both groups. They are each highly focused on their demands in the negotiation, otherwise known as their target points.

Explanation: The target point is the point at which a negotiator would like to conclude negotiations. It is his optimistic goal for a specific topic. The bargaining mix is the package of issues up for negotiation. Each part in the bargaining mix, can have its own starting, target and resistance point.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which approach to innovation lays emphasis on the importance of gaining inputs to innovation from external sources?

Mkey [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.

Here are three key shifts:

Passive recipients to active co-creator
Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
Own and protect to share and expand

7 0

3 years ago

Law enforcement officers suspect chris of drug trafficking. without a warrant, the officers install a tracking device on a vehic

algol [13]

Under the principles discussed in "A Sample Court Case," United States v. Jones, the court is most likely to rule that the officers' installation of the device was not a search because the officers did not obtain a warrant. Chris's argument was right; there should be a warrant presented for it to be considered as a lawful search.

5 0

3 years ago