Answer:
It is known as pluralistic ignorance.
Explanation:
Pluralistic ignorance occurs in social situations when an individual does not feel free to express their opinion and makes a wrong inference of what their peers think, so they end up accepting the option they believe the group would choose, even if they disagree.
An example would be: Karla is on the bus, and a person sits next to her, she watches the woman and thinks that looks like a kind person and would like to talk with her for a while, but nobody talks with other people on the bus so avoid talking to her.
The spectator effect is an example of pluralistic ignorance; when an emergency occurs, the larger the group that observed the emergency situation, the less likely someone will help. The individual in the group may think that it would not be right to help, or that he/she should not help because surely another person would help.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
Self-determination theory
Explanation:
Self-determination theory observes how individuals go pursuing fulfilment, a state of well being that includes:
<em>The psychological needs and the growth are essential to Self-determination theory: The feelings of confidence, autonomy, relatedness</em>
<em> </em>
Being able to matter in the life of other people, having a sense of mastery over the environment, and autonomy concerning others was self-initiated, wholeheartedly to begin actions without asking for others opinion.
Motivation will be the centre of this theory, so an example will typically be :
If someone decides to learn something and engage immediately without hesitating and not to take into consideration the level of difficulty neither the opinion of his friends or social connotations related to it.
Doing something for the sake of it will be referred to as self-propelled behaviour.
