Sara worked 1 day last week
Joan worked for 20 hours last week
And Erin worked for 10 hours last week
Answer:
3/6 for the probability of getting and odd number and 2/6 for rolling higher than the number 4
Step-by-step explanation:
<span>First of all, there should be coherence for the units of measurement -- either they are all meters or they are all ft. I would assume they are all ft.
The correct answer is 75 ft above. T
The explanation is the following: suppose the ground level is the x-axis, the 2 feet of the arch lie respectively on (0,0) and (100,0) on the ground level. Since the arch is 100ft high, the vertex of the parabola will be the point (100,100). Thus, we can find the equation describing the parabola by putting the three points we know in a system and we find that the equation of the parabola is y=(-1/100)x^2+2
To find the focus F, we apply the formula for the focus of a vertical axis parabola, i.e. F(-b/2a;(1-b^2+4ac)/4a).
By substituting a=-1/100, b=2 and c=0 into the formula, we find that the coordinates of the focus F are (100,75).
So we conclude that the focus lies 75ft above ground.</span>
Answer:
we say for μ = 50.00 mm we be 95% confident that machine calibrated properly with ( 49.926757 , 50.033243 )
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
n=29
mean of x = 49.98 mm
S = 0.14 mm
μ = 50.00 mm
Cl = 95%
to find out
Can we be 95% confident that machine calibrated properly
solution
we know from t table
t at 95% and n -1 = 29-1 = 28 is 2.048
so now
Now for 95% CI for mean is
(x - 2.048 × S/√n , x + 2.048 × S/√n )
(49.98 - 2.048 × 0.14/√29 , 49.98 + 2.048 × 0.14/√29 )
( 49.926757 , 50.033243 )
hence we say for μ = 50.00 mm we be 95% confident that machine calibrated properly with ( 49.926757 , 50.033243 )
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Solving Equations Using Successive Approximations</u>
We need to find the solution to the equation
where
The approximation has been already started and reached a state for x=2.5 where
The difference between the results is 0.25, we need further steps to reach a good solution (to the nearest tenth)
Let's test for x=2.4
The new difference is -0.2+0.24=0.04
It's accurate enough, thus the solution is
