Answer:
"Buying on margin" is borrowing money from a broker to purchase stock.
Explanation:
You can think of it as a loan from your brokerage. Margin trading allows you to buy more stock than you'd be able to normally. To trade on margin, you need a margin account.
Answer:
The Monroe doctrine stated that the U.S. should use military force to prevent any form of intervention from an European power in the western hemisphere.
The Roosevelt corollary was different in that it allowed European powers to intervene as long as the intervention was considered justified, but not to invade.
This difference became clear during the Venezuelan crisis of 1902-1903, when Germany, Britain, and Italy imposed a naval blockade on Venezuela because the Venezuela president refused to pay for the damages suffered by European citizens during the recent civil war.
At first, Theodore Roosevelt allowed the blockade to continue because he believed that it was justified, but when Germany threatened to invade Venezuela, he intervened sending a fleet under Admiral George Dewey.
The reason why the indulgences paid to the Catholic Church sparked the Protestant Reformation was that many religious scholars felt that indulgences went against the Words of the Bible.
<h3>How did indulgences lead to the Protestant Reformation?</h3>
Indulgences annoyed several Christian scholars such as Martin Luther who argued that paying for sins to be forgiven was against the word of the Gospel.
As a result, new denominations in Christianity broke out and this led to the period known as the Protestant Reformation.
Find out more on the Protestant Reformation at brainly.com/question/10042017
#SPJ1
Answer:
what it was: On 2 May 1803, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase delivered a charge to a Baltimore grand jury in which he blasted Congress and the Jefferson administration for repealing the Judiciary Act of 1801 and thus unseating federal circuit court judges.
significance: The conventional wisdom regarding the outcome of Chase's impeachment—the only such proceeding ever brought against a U.S. Supreme Court justice—is that it showed that a judge could not be removed simply for taking politically unpopular positions.
Explanation: