Governments are supposed to have limited power because they are meant to serve the people, not the other way around.
Considering that, having stricter rules mean that the rules won't jut "do what they want" when in power.
Having strict rules and strict functions to each statesmen means that they are more likely to do what they are meant to instead of turning the power of the government against the people.
C. europe hope you get it right tell me if its right or not
They are valuable for the appointive procedure. The two gatherings fill in as a quite decent method for getting similarly invested individuals together. In the event that they were not there, it would be substantially harder to distinguish great competitors, motivate them to keep running for office, bolster them.
They fill in as a contradicting element to the intrigue gatherings. In the event that it were not for parties, the intrigue gatherings would be unopposed. The gatherings attempt to pull individuals together in expansive coalitions. The intrigue bunches attempt to pull them separated on single issues.
C the united states and canada
The reconstruction of the south made it easier for certain people to travel,work, and live from the rebuilding or railroads and/or buildings
