1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DIA [1.3K]
3 years ago
10

Why did Britain took lead in the industrial revolution

History
1 answer:
Alex17521 [72]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Because many factors contributed to Britain's dominance, including agricultural changes, a population boom, economic innovations, new ideas and a scientific viewpoint, transportation foundations, natural resources, a supportive government, and a trade network with numerous colonies.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
If you stacked up 4.2 trillion german marks how high will it reach?
ANEK [815]

Answer:

4

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which idea would most likely be held by a member of the Democratic Party?
jasenka [17]
I think it’s letter C.....
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
que consecuencias sociales y políticas tuvieron la industrializacion y el imperialismo para el mundo​
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

Comencemos con las consecuencias para las metrópolis: El imperialismo sirvió de estímulo a la industrialización en aquellas áreas donde aún era débil y favoreció su consolidación allí donde ya estaba en marcha. Esto provocó un rápido desarrollo y crecimiento económico para las naciones imperialistas.

Explanation:

:)

7 0
3 years ago
Elissa is suspectedof shoplifting. She has already faced a preliminary hearing in magistrate court. What is the next step in th
kondor19780726 [428]
If you are held for court, the next step in the process is arraignment. Formal arraignment is a hearing in which a judge or commissioner will advise the defendant of the charges that have survived the preliminary hearing and ask the defendant how he or she pleads.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What caused conflict between various groups of people in the west
Gelneren [198K]
<span>At the core of most intractable conflicts are deeply rooted divisions affecting parties' fundamental interests, needs and values. These include irreconcilable moral values, matters of justice and human rights, high-stakes distributional issues, unmet human needs, and issues of identity. Such conflicts tend to be protracted and have very damaging effects.IntroductionIntractable conflicts are ones that remain unresolved for long periods of time and then become stuck at a high level of intensity and destructiveness. They typically involve many parties and concern an intricate set of historical, religious, cultural, political, and economic issues.[1] These matters are central to human social existence and typically resist any attempts at resolution. In fact, parties often refuse to negotiate or compromise with respect to such issues. As a result, each side views the rigid position of the other as a threat to its very existence. They may develop a mutual fear of each other and a profound desire to inflict as much physical and psychological harm on each other as possible.[2] This sense of threat and hostility often pervades the everyday lives of the parties involved and overrides their ability to recognize any shared concerns they might have.<span>


Additional insights into the underlying causes of intractable conflicts are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants.</span>As conflict escalates, any tangible issues may become embedded within a larger set of values, beliefs, identities, and cultures. Disputes about land, money, or other resources may take on increased symbolic significance.[3] Over the course of conflict, the original issues can even become irrelevant as new causes for conflict are generated by actions within the conflict itself. Those on opposing sides come to view each other as enemies and may resort to highly destructive means. Eventually, the parties become unable to separate different issues and may see no way out of the conflict other than through total victory or defeat.[4]Why do some conflicts become intractable? Many describe intractability in terms of the destructive relationship dynamics that govern the adversaries' interaction. For example, if one party resorts to inhumane treatment in waging conflict, this deepens antagonism and may lead the opposing side to seek revenge.[5] Likewise, when extremist political leaders appeal to ethno-nationalist ideology to arouse fear, this may increase support for the use of violence and contribute to intractability. Other factors that make some conflicts extremely difficult to resolve include the vast numbers of people involved, the large number of complex issues to be resolved, and a previous history of violent confrontation. But what are the underlying causes of these destructive conflict dynamics?What is common to all intractable conflicts is that they involve interests or values that the disputants regard as critical to their survival. These underlying causes include parties' moral values, identities, and fundamental human needs. Because conflicts grounded in these issues involve the basic molds for thought and action within given communities and culture, they are usually not resolvable by negotiation or compromise.[6] This is because the problem in question is one that cannot be resolved in a win-win way. If one value system is followed, another is threatened. If one nation controls a piece of land, another does not. If one group is dominant, another is subordinate.While sharing is possible in theory, contending sides usually regard compromise as a loss. This is especially true in societies where natural fear and hatred is so ingrained that opposing groups cannot imagine living with or working cooperatively with the other side. Instead, they are often willing to take whatever means necessary to ensure group survival and protect their way of life. Below are brief summaries of some of the central underlying causes of intractable conflict.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the social status of a bureaucrat in ancient egypt
    8·1 answer
  • What are the pros and cons after the WW1 (World War 1)
    11·1 answer
  • What legal and political idea is contained in this edict from Hammurabi’s Code? A. limits of power B. protection from unreasonab
    14·1 answer
  • How is amendment 11 important
    13·1 answer
  • Which two countries were split by civil wars between Arab Muslims in the north and non-Muslim groups in the south?. A. Algeria.
    13·2 answers
  • List 2-3 questions you still have about the "Black Death" or how people understood it?
    6·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP EXTRA POINTS
    9·1 answer
  • 12. Which position did Franklin Pierce begin holding in 1853?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the Atlantic slave trade start?
    10·1 answer
  • How did<br> Shakespeare's plays reflect<br> Renaissance ideas?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!