Susan will need 3 meters of fabric
For the seagull to catch the crab, h(t)=g(t) so:
-16t^2+45=-13t+23 add 16t^2 to both sides
45=16t^2-13t+23 subtract 45 from both sides
16t^2-13t-22=0 using the quadratic equation:
t=(13±√1577)/32, since t>0
t=(13+√1577)/32 seconds
t≈1.65 seconds (to nearest hundredth of a second)
And the height that this occurs using either original equation is:
h((13+√1577)/32)≈1.59 ft (to nearest hundredth of a foot)
(step 1) (6a+5)(a-1)=0
(step 2) 6a+5=0 or a-1=0
answer is
a= -5/6 or a= 1
i hope this helps! ;)
For this case the first thing you should do is observe that the diameter of the four semicircles is the same.
Therefore, we can decompose the figure as follows:
1) We draw the diameters of the four semicircles to form a square.
2) We divide the figure into a square and four semicircles
3) The total area is the sum of the area of the square, plus the area of the 4 semicircles.
Answer:
c)as a square and four semicircles
Answer:
The correct option is;
(3) The sample of track athletes show that there is a correlation between foot size and running speed
Step-by-step explanation:
The statements are analysed as follows;
(1) Smaller foot sizes cause track athletes to run slower.
The above statement is a conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement because there are other factors such as taller athletes run faster than average sized athletes
(2) The sample of track athletes shows a causal relationship between
foot size and running speed.
The above statement is similar to the one above as it is a milder conclusion and it infers more information than is contained in the question statement
(3) The sample of track athletes shows a correlation between foot size
and running speed.
The above statement is correct as is directly supported by the data as it is a statement made based directly the data
(4) There is no correlation between foot size and running speed in
track athletes.
The above statement is not supported by the available data.
