Answer:
Modal of permission: Students may be allowed to use their personal computers in class to take notes and read digital books.
Modal of obligation: Students and teachers have to recycle papers.
Modal of prohibition: The school does not have to leave the lights on when no one is in the classroom
Explanation:
Modals of permission are used in a sentence to inform or ask if an action is allowed. These modals are can, may, and could. May and could are more formal than can.
Modals of obligation are used in a sentence to inform of something compulsory. Must is a modal of obligation use for a personal obligation like I must study for the exam, or rules like you must wear gloves in the laboratory. Have to, is also a modal of obligation, but it expresses general obligation like Students have to study hard for the exam.
Modals of prohibition are in sentences that express something that is not allowed. They are can not and must not. For example, you can not smoke inside this building.
Answer:
Asthma
Reason why is because , if you look up the sympyoms to all of those bronchial airway only fits with asthma.
Answer:
For me I wish someone had taught me that getting along with people well is actually far more important than being superb at your job. I saw it 1000 times that the easier-going person got promoted and the more determined workaholic who really knew their stuff were passed over. I never learned how to small talk.
I was told several times that college is the most important time of a person’s life and that the relationships made then are crucially important down the line. I spent far too much time becoming an outstanding student/MD and far too little time complimenting the nurses and administrators, etc., always willing to linger for small talk even if patients were waiting on me. It took a long time for me to realize that no one cared how expert I was as long as I completed the minimum necessary work, and the patients’ outcomes were of scarce importance to them.
Now with internet access it’s much easier to maintain relationships, although the substance seems much shallower than a handwritten snail mail letter from generations ago when literacy was really valued and letters were creative.
I’ve never spent time arguing since it always seemed pointless to me. I was right. I think of the thousands of arguments I've witnessed over the years and the nonsense I put up with with so many combative personalities. If only I knew then that people cannot communicate properly when arguing so it’s a complete waste of time for everyone. I decided many years ago to never sit through such nonsense and simply say “let’s table this until everyone is calm” and then I exit.
Explanation:
"There is NOTHING MORE DISTRESSING to every good patriot, to every good American, than the hard, scoffing spirit which treats the ALLEGATION of dishonesty in a public man as a cause for laughter. " - really good line imo
My best guess would be answer C.
My reasoning is the words used and the meaning behind them, without the need of being emboldened " nothing more distressing " is a powerful a way you can distinguish something to be distressing. The speaker/author is speaking powerfully; anent? I believe the speaker is having issues with how indifferent the public is reacting when a person of government has been dishonest (or when a person of government is accused of being dishonest). He says in fact that the "scoffing spirit" among people that take these allegations lightly, is to him, the most distressing event.
Therefore my best guess would be that this speaker is speaking with criticism towards those willing to hear.
