Answer:
The USA were more so ideologically driven by 1945.
Explanation:
In 1939, the USA and USSR, alongside other powers (ie. Great Britain), were united against a common enemy: Adolf Hitler. This incentivised all countries to put their differences aside and unite against Hitler, in order to end the rule of one of the largest threats of the 20th century. Thus, in 1939, the USA were largely cooperative and cordial.
By 1945, once Hitler and the Nazis’ rule was over, albeit the USA attempted to keep strong ties with countries such as the USSR (seen with US President Roosevelt’s friendship with USSR leader Joseph Stalin), ultimately, USA’s next steps were becoming increasingly dependent on the USA’s ideological differences to that of the USSR, bearing in mind the USA were capitalist and the USSR were communist/ Marxist- Leninist. This is evidenced with Truman (Roosevelt’s successor as US President)’s approach to the USSR at the Potsdam conference from the 17th July- 2nd August 1945.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer: the United States declared war against span
Explanation: here's ur answer: americas support the ongoing struggle by cubans and filipinos aganist spain rule, and the mysterious explosion of the battleships U.S.S. Maine in Havana Harbor. ur welcome
The cultural center that are most likely to qualify under the1954 Hague cultural property convention are;
- A center square containing monuments representing ancient cultures
- A museum containing artifacts and historical writings.
<h3>What happened at the 1954 Hague cultural property convention?</h3>
The Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Aggressive War is the first international convention that focuses only on cultural property protection in armed conflict. It was signed on 14 May 1954 in The Hague, Netherlands, and went into effect on 7 August 1956.
<h3>Why did the Hague Convention come into being?</h3>
These accords are known as "The Hague Conventions" because they were adopted at the 1899 and 1907 Peace Conferences in The Hague, Netherlands.
They formalize the laws and traditions of war by specifying the regulations that belligerents must observe throughout hostilities.
Hence, it is right to state that the cultural center that are most likely to qualify under the1954 Hague cultural property convention are;
- A center square containing monuments representing ancient cultures
- A museum containing artifacts and historical writings.
Learn more about Hague Cultural Convention:
brainly.com/question/10805709
#SPJ1
Answer:
Rasputin was an unusual man who appears to have had genuine healing talents. He came to the attention to Tsar Nicholas II and the Tsarina Alexandria when he successfully healed the favorite hunting dog of a member of the royal family. ... His influence with the royal family remained strong after that. Tsar Nicholas II was unable to rule effectively. He made poor decisions that led to worsening relations with the government and increased hardship for civilians and soldiers alike.
Nicholas refused to accept any reduction in the absolute power he held.He was detached from the plight of the Russian people and his policies also alienated ethnic minorities.When the Duma was recalled during World War 1, a group of Octoberists and Kadets established the Progressive Bloc. This group wanted to have more control over the war. In response, in 1915, Nicholas closed the Duma. This alienated many liberals.Nicholas declared himself Commander in Chief of the army and departed for the Eastern Front to take control of operations.However, Nicholas was not well educated in the tactics of war. Moreover, his absence left a weakened government in Petrograd (formerly St Petersburg).
Explanation:
Hope this helps! - Oseli
Both compulsory and voluntary voting systems have merit, and this has to be considered if it were to be implemented in the U.S. A large benefit would be more voter representation. Democracy is very important to the united states, but low voter turnout means that it can be difficult for every person's voice to be heard. Furthermore, some people, like prisoners, don't get the right to vote, and this also hinders representation, especially concerning laws surrounding the justice system. However, a con of a mandatory system is that it Violates the freedom of choice, which in America value greatly. Free choice is an important right, and the government mandating voting can be seen as a violation of this. Making more people vote in incredibly needed yo have a healthy democratic country, but at the same time, it is also debatable whether mandatory voting is the best way to do it.
