Both compulsory and voluntary voting systems have merit, and this has to be considered if it were to be implemented in the U.S. A large benefit would be more voter representation. Democracy is very important to the united states, but low voter turnout means that it can be difficult for every person's voice to be heard. Furthermore, some people, like prisoners, don't get the right to vote, and this also hinders representation, especially concerning laws surrounding the justice system. However, a con of a mandatory system is that it Violates the freedom of choice, which in America value greatly. Free choice is an important right, and the government mandating voting can be seen as a violation of this. Making more people vote in incredibly needed yo have a healthy democratic country, but at the same time, it is also debatable whether mandatory voting is the best way to do it.
Answer:Making voting mandatory in the United States would increase voter turnout, ensuring that the voices of more citizens are included in choosing representatives. However, many people might believe mandatory voting goes against the American ideals of individualism, freedom of thought, and personal choice.
He was able to pass down the civil rights bill which Kennedy couldn't (he was assassinated) and he was able to pass the 1965 Voting rights act which had a huge impact
The Magna Carta required the king or queen to seek legislative approval if he or she sought a certain amount of funds to pay for a war or expenditure. This was implemented to decrease spending.
Isaac Newton was a physicist and mathematician who developed the principles of modern physics, including the laws of motion, and is credited as one of the great minds of the 17th-century Scientific Revolution.