The second firm finds that though demand is not perfectly elastic, it is now comparatively more elastic. The second firm marginal revenue will be more elastic and its profit maximizing price will be lower. A monopolist probably also considers in policies that indulgence monopolies since it gives them greater power. A monopolist has slight incentive to progress their product because customers have no replacements. Instead, the motivation is dedicated on defending the monopoly.
With the absence of the options to choose from, lets look at general results of using cost-benefit analysis.
Explanation:
using cost-benefit analysis is a strategic way of making decisions based on cost and benefit solely.
Ideally any investment or strategic decision to be made by an institution needs a cost-benefit analysis.
This is done by listing all the projected resources needed to take up the strategic objective and costed. After which another list is made of the potential benefit that is likely to come to the organisation.
When the two is compared we say <em>you are making cost-benefit </em>analysis.
More often without secondary reasons, the option with the highest benefit over cost is chosen.
This cost and benefit analysis are made both qualitatively and quantitatively.
Quantitatively methods such as NPV are used.
#learnwithbrainly
Explanation:
<h2>Advantages</h2><h2>Ability to raise funds by selling stock. ... </h2><h2>Availability of financial information. ... </h2><h2>Increased government and regulatory scrutiny. ... </h2><h2>Strict adherence to global accounting standards. ... </h2><h2>Due diligence. ... </h2><h2>Prospectus. ... </h2><h2>SEC approval.</h2>
They should just probably hire another employee or something I don’t know.
Answer:
-1.83%
Explanation:
The closing price was 12,743.40, which was down by .
it means that the opening price was
$12,743.40 + $237.44 = $12,980.44.
The percentage return will be the
return/ original price x 100
=- - 237.44/12,980.44 x 100
= - 0.018291574 x 100
= - 1.83%
