<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
See back then farming was really important and they weren't really industrialized uuntil after the civil war.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Wealth, power and prestige are unequally distributed among people around the world. As a result, individuals in societies around the world can be easily grouped according to how much wealth, power and prestige that they possess.
Such grouping known as Global Stratification classifies individuals around the world according to their different lifestyle and life chances due to unequal distribution of wealth, power and prestige. Such classification draws attention to the inequalities between people in different countries of the world.
I believe your answer would be Hippocrates.
If I had written your question in English, I could have helped you
