Anselm argued that an ideal being is important to exist. during this argument God is an excellent being thus he should exist that is understood because of the ontological argument. Guanilo thought this argument was absurd and he viewed the other. one thing doesn't exist simply because it's excellent and he used the instance of an ideal island. The island is ideal thus in step with Anselm's view it ought to exist however the island stop to exist thus Guanilo planned this argument to be reductio ad absurdum. as compared they each agree that as a result, of one thing is ideal it doesn't exist however in distinction saint believed that God was an exception to the present because God is a whole totally different matter and Gaunilo doesn't believe God is an exception to the present view, though he Guanilo believes in God he doesn't consider the ontological argument as proof of Gods existence.
Answer:
Article 1, section 2 and 3
Explanation:
Article 1, section 2 provides that the house of representatives shall have the sole power to impeach and the Senate shall have the power to try all impeachment proceedings. However, no person shall be convicted without two-third of the members present.
Because <span>dissatisfied employees will find a way to respond, most likely in ways that are harmful to the organization.
For examples, those employees could perform below the standard on purpose, steal the company's money, or even try to sabotage the deals that the company needs in order to advance its operation.</span>
The
"mentor/apprentice" model of learning in the given scenario above is
most similar to Vygotsky<span>'s theory of cognitive development.</span>
To add, Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky was a Soviet psychologist, the founder of an unfinished theory of human cultural and
bio-social development commonly referred to as cultural-historical psychology<span>.</span>
