1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr-060686 [28]
3 years ago
14

The First Amendment guarantees us the freedom of speech, but there are limits if the speech would start actions that would harm

others. Which of the following is speech that is legally limited speech?
History
1 answer:
jarptica [38.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Any speech that may directly affect some one or a group of people in a dangerous way.

Explanation:

Yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded building, that could lead to people swarming out trampling each other and basically disturbing the peace.

You might be interested in
. As world war ii brought the end of the japanese empire, what took place in the countries of china and korea?
Yanka [14]
<span>They had civil wars supported by foreign countries.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
What was the holocaust?<br>What did the nuremberg laws do?​
devlian [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

In 1935 Hitler had 2 laws passed that accomplished the following.

  • Jews were deprived of their German citizenship and
  • German purity (blood) was protected by forbidding Jews from Marrying German Citizens. Any sexual relations between the races was also prohibited.
  • These two laws were the Nuremberg Laws.

The Holocaust was the attempt by Hitler and the German Nazi Party to murder every Jew (in the world if they got that far) but certainly in Europe. They diminished the Jewish population in Europe by 1/2 killing 6 million of them -- a number I find incomprehensible and an act even more incomprehensible.  

I urge you to search out the word Holocaust. The German Holocaust was not the only one. There were quite a few even after world war II. You would think that the one in Europe would have been enough. It certainly wasn't.

5 0
2 years ago
Yo otra vez en otra cuenta
ololo11 [35]

Answer:

i dont know

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What means this payment was meant to keep certain groups of people (mainly former slaves and african-americans) from being allow
OLga [1]
They were allowed to vote but had to pay an amount too high for them to ever obtain so its like they still couldnt vote.
7 0
3 years ago
6. Which one of the following statements is accurate for the Articles of Confederation?
MrMuchimi
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the Articles gave the federal government practically no power over the states, meaning that they could not tax and raise revenue.</span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What product did Britain continue to export despite objections by the Chinese government?
    8·2 answers
  • hey do you knoww these 2 questions and how to answer them - What was established in the case of Miranda v. Arizona? How does thi
    9·1 answer
  • In the 1800 how long did it take for ships to travel across Atlantic ocean
    5·2 answers
  • George washington was greatly alarmed by shays's rebellion. <br><br> a. True <br><br> b. False
    8·1 answer
  • What was the goal of European missionaries as they travel to the rain forests of central Africa
    7·1 answer
  • Which term best relates to the government in the us
    12·2 answers
  • What did people wear in ancient Rome?
    10·2 answers
  • What characteristic made Texas good for raising
    9·1 answer
  • Hey can anyone pls pls pls answer dis!!!
    8·1 answer
  • How rich is the Philippines?​
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!